What is?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Except YOU are the one who has whined multiple times about CONVERSATION.

YOU are the one accusing people of judging with their feelings.

I am ASKING you to have conversation and discussion, and ASKING you to evaluate the evidence and not just run with your feelings.

Why refuse to do the things you specifically complain are not being done?
Come on, join the conversation. Doth the feelings you complain others are using to make judgements.
Evaluate the evidence.

Hey Rob... What PROOF do you have that Trump specifically mocked that mans affliction?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I don't care if he did or didn't **** someone. He isn't in jail for it and is not convicted of it so....

Yet you care very much that Biden treats children as if he is a grandfather.

21,000 quotes. Cool. Let me guess, quotes from Trump by default are lies... how about if Biden said the same things?

No. A lie is a lie. A quote of it is simply the written representation of the exact words spoken.
If Biden lies and it is quoted, those are quotes of lies.

He declassified them, with his mind... he said so. No harm, no foul.

Really? So if I decide in my mind that you gave me a gift of money and I take the money from your house, no harm no foul?
Do you really think Trump is absolved just by thinking he is? Honest question.

Gas prices were fine under Trump.

Gas prices rose immediately after he got in office. Why is it ok under Trump but not under Biden?

Cry some more Rob. Cry some more.
No crying. Just evaluating reality based on facts.

I don’t cry about gas prices because I can view them logically, evaluate based on fact, and know that in the long run, this bump under Biden doesn’t affect me. YOU see a few bucks out of your pocket as the be-all/end-all and allow it to ruin your day.
THAT is “crying”.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hey Rob... What PROOF do you have that Trump specifically mocked that mans affliction?

I gave the circumstantial evidence and what it means to my decision.
Provide an opposite argument. You haven’t done so yet.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I gave the circumstantial evidence and what it means to my decision.
Provide an opposite argument. You haven’t done so yet.

What you have is an assumption based on your feelings and nothing more.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What you have is an assumption based on your feelings and nothing more.

You want conversation so bad, try to have one.
Provide the evidence you are using to make your decision.
Take the evidence I have provided and explain it away. Tell my why my logical evaluation is wrong.
Have the conversation you keep asking for.

Maybe pretend it DID go to court, and you have to defend Trump against the evidence?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You want conversation so bad, try to have one.
Provide the evidence you are using to make your decision.
Take the evidence I have provided and explain it away. Tell my why my logical evaluation is wrong.
Have the conversation you keep asking for.

You are reaching. He didn't mock his affliction. Like I said, if he was mocking him he would not have flailed around as that mans affliction is not one that has spasms and uncontrolled body movements. That would be Parkinson's. He was mocking him in such a way as to convey that the reporter looked stupid when he was backpedaling. Perhaps if you weren't letting your dislike of Trump cloud your brain you could be unbiased.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You are reaching. He didn't mock his affliction. Like I said, if he was mocking him he would not have flailed around as that mans affliction is not one that has spasms and uncontrolled body movements. That would be Parkinson's. He was mocking him in such a way as to convey that the reporter looked stupid when he was backpedaling. Perhaps if you weren't letting your dislike of Trump cloud your brain you could be unbiased.

This is a good start. Why was he “mocking by flailing” when Kovaleski never had a reason to flail, never backpedaled on his article, and still has not changed his stance?
Why imitate Parkinson’s to show groveling?

Does Trump automatically think people grovel and cower simply because he expresses displeasure with them?
“Grovel grovel grovel” was what he described his flailing as.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

This is a good start. Why was he “mocking by flailing” when Kovaleski never had a reason to flail, never backpedaled on his article, and still has not changed his stance?

Does Trump automatically think people grovel and cower simply because he expresses displeasure with them?
“Grovel grovel grovel” was what he described his flailing as.

Who knows? Maybe that is just how Trump mocks people. The truth is, nobody except Donald Trump knows why he chose to mock that man that way. Trump said what he did and why he did it. I am not going to jump to conclusions and make up my own reason for what and why he did it. That is nothing more than conjecture. You know I am right. You act like you are intelligent... use some now and some of that critical thinking. While you are at it, do it without bias and tell me if you can sit there and say you know 100% that he was mocking that mans affliction.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Who knows? Maybe that is just how Trump mocks people. The truth is, nobody except Donald Trump knows why he chose to mock that man that way. Trump said what he did and why he did it. I am not going to jump to conclusions and make up my own reason for what and why he did it. That is nothing more than conjecture. You know I am right. You act like you are intelligent... use some now and some of that critical thinking. While you are at it, do it without bias and tell me if you can sit there and say you know 100% that he was mocking that mans affliction.

You accuse me of making decisions by feelings, yet you ignore any evidence that can be used to make an evaluation. Making a decision without assessing facts, evidence, proof, etc. is deciding based on feelings.
You are doing exactly what you tell other people not to do.
I don’t think I’m being unreasonable when I ask you to do as you say. I can point out many instances where you refused to accept facts and made decisions based on your feelings.

OF COURSE I cannot say with 100% certainty that he was mocking him. But when all circumstances point to it, then I rely on them.
I don’t ignore them simply because I FEEL he didn’t, or because I want to defend him.

 

[El Wapo]

Dude, you can't even put a thought up here without posting a fvcking meme.
For all you've shown here, you're a kid with an IQ of 85.
Try to contribute some thoughts before you comment on ANYONE else.

To close to home bobby?

 

[El Wapo]

Who knows? Maybe that is just how Trump mocks people. The truth is, nobody except Donald Trump knows why he chose to mock that man that way. Trump said what he did and why he did it. I am not going to jump to conclusions and make up my own reason for what and why he did it. That is nothing more than conjecture. You know I am right. You act like you are intelligent... use some now and some of that critical thinking. While you are at it, do it without bias and tell me if you can sit there and say you know 100% that he was mocking that mans affliction.

We have already established that mean tweets and killing unborn kids is all they care about. Sky high inflation , soaring fuel and food cost and border security mean nothing to libs. Since they do not provide the least bit of production for this nation.....only take from those that do. Without conservatives they would starve.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

To close to home bobby?View attachment 44661

Hmmmm, Democrats outnumber Republicans.
Democrats pay the bills for the country.
Democrats make for a better economy.

And you are proud to be a Republican, why?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The backpedal is what cemented it for me.
The claim of groveling when Kovaleski had no reason to grovel (and still hasn’t); the mannerisms in no way representing “groveling”; the “greatest memory of all time” not remembering a pretty memorable guy he had over ten interactions with.

Hell, I once heard Ozzy Osbourne being interviewed on radio and they took a phone call for a listener. She mentioned a concert she went to and was front row. Ozzy said “I remember you!” and went on to describe her physical appearance.
And Trump claims he can’t remember this guy after a dozen interactions?

Circumstantial evidence ain’t great, but when there is more than one piece of it…

“He fell on the knife. Backwards. Six times.”
The circumstances tell the story.

I don't know how much credence I give to his back pedaling. Trump's a typical politician and they seem to default to lie first and spin later.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You accuse me of making decisions by feelings, yet you ignore any evidence that can be used to make an evaluation. Making a decision without assessing facts, evidence, proof, etc. is deciding based on feelings.
You are doing exactly what you tell other people not to do.
I don’t think I’m being unreasonable when I ask you to do as you say. I can point out many instances where you refused to accept facts and made decisions based on your feelings.

OF COURSE I cannot say with 100% certainty that he was mocking him. But when all circumstances point to it, then I rely on them.
I don’t ignore them simply because I FEEL he didn’t, or because I want to defend him.

Rob... you are the one with this "fact" fetish. Just because you demand them all the time doesn't mean we are all just going to bow down and ignore our human feelings just to please you.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I don't know how much credence I give to his back pedaling. Trump's a typical politician and they seem to default to lie first and spin later.

Trump is a business man. Not a politician. One of many reasons the politicians hate him.