What is?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Make up your mind. It's OK to quote facts that others have already proved, or it isn't?
Or is it OK for you, but not for me? If it's only OK for you, I would suggest that you at least get it right when you "borrow" and repeat it.
Borrowing, changing, and repeating it as incorrect info is just a fail.

You tell me. I mentioned military family members in a conversation and relayed their feelings. You said I borrowed their valor. Well, all you do is copy and paste from other people... borrowed knowledge right? Or does hypocrisy not apply to you? You bashed me like I burned down a children's hospital... but you argue on and on and on the words you borrow from other people.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You tell me. I mentioned military family members in a conversation and relayed their feelings. You said I borrowed their valor. Well, all you do is copy and paste from other people... borrowed knowledge right? Or does hypocrisy not apply to you? You bashed me like I burned down a children's hospital... but you argue on and on and on the words you borrow from other people.

Quoting knowledge is not "borrowing knowledge". bringing up family members who have no grievance with the military when discussing your belief that it's OK for the military to screw servicemembers over? Yeah, that's borrowing their valor. You're using THEIR time in the military to somehow justify your feelings when THEIR time served isn't relevant to the conversation.

Facts are not feelings or opinions. When I state or re-state something that has already been proved as fact, I am not claiming I discovered or proved the fact. I am just stating it is known. And I can always back up what I state or re-state with sources.
I can tell you the circumference of Earth as a fact, even though I didn't measure it and wouldn't know how. I can tell you that the heart is a muscle that contracts and pumps blood throughout the body, even though I have never done an autopsy or seen a fresh human heart (only cross sections that were frozen and sliced).

See the difference in concepts?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Quoting knowledge is not "borrowing knowledge". bringing up family members who have no grievance with the military when discussing your belief that it's OK for the military to screw servicemembers over? Yeah, that's borrowing their valor. You're using THEIR time in the military to somehow justify your feelings when THEIR time served isn't relevant to the conversation.

Facts are not feelings or opinions. When I state or re-state something that has already been proved as fact, I am not claiming I discovered or proved the fact. I am just stating it is known. And I can always back up what I state or re-state with sources.
I can tell you the circumference of Earth as a fact, even though I didn't measure it and wouldn't know how. I can tell you that the heart is a muscle that contracts and pumps blood throughout the body, even though I have never done an autopsy or seen a fresh human heart (only cross sections that were frozen and sliced).

See the difference in concepts?

How did I know it would be different for you Awwwweeeeeeeeeee it's like I knew it before I posted it.

 

[El Wapo]

Rob....

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Hmmm. So when I quote information from others, I am "passing it off as my own knowledge?".
With that logic, you can never state anything other than a personal feeling, lest you are trying to pass other's knowledge off as your own.

The funny thing is that you can't even successfully pass other's knowledge off as your own. Medical textbooks for over a century have said there are nerves in bone, and you got it wrong.
That's like stealing an empty money bag and thinking you are suddenly rich, despite looking into an empty space.

Since you didn't actually discover the nerves within the bones, you're not qualified to comment on it... OTOH, since THX didn't discover that there are no nerves with our bones...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Since you didn't actually discover the nerves within the bones, you're not qualified to comment on it... OTOH, since THX didn't discover that there are no nerves with our bones...

Seems that Thxone's textbook doesn't cover it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob....View attachment 43049
View attachment 43048

Did you find it yet? When you do, apologize to the rest of humanity too.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob is using the tried and true lib approach of blaming the other side for what they have done. In other words.....proving he is a uneducated indoctrinate sheep.View attachment 43035

You might want to spend a little time learning basic grammar and spelling before you dive too hard into using your own words instead of just memes.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

And no offense... or be offended, I don't care but you are two guys on an internet forum. I am sure your knowledge is far superior to those who practice and teach in this field. When I say theoretical it is because it is still being studied which means nobody has all the answers, nothing is definitive which means it has no choice but to be theoretical. That does not mean they have no knowledge but it for sure does not make me wrong.

I will make it simple for the laymen. A car driving through the tunnel is not in or on the mountain just as the nerve passing through the bone is not in or on the bone. It is passing through a tunnel. When these nerves are disturbed they receive and send signals and the body responds. Be it for the body to repair the area around that nerve (The Bone) or to cause pain and so on. I don't think I can explain it down more than that.

Why would you say, "you are two guys on the internet?"

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You might want to spend a little time learning basic grammar and spelling before you dive too hard into using your own words instead of just memes.

Kids these days!

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

What does it matter??? I linked papers from Orthopedic doctors and images from medical studies. I have no medical background other than injuries sustained and I can tell you bones do indeed hurt.

Again no medical background, but I can tell you HS Pyso we covered the skeleton. That teacher (who I assume had some sort degree) taught us the skeleton indeed has nerves, which allow it to respond to stimuli, ie it can increase blood output in response to blood loss.

Just pointing out good ol' rob expects every to have a background in what they say is all...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Why would you say, "you are two guys on the internet?"

It's self explanatory.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Seems that Thxone's textbook doesn't cover it.
View attachment 43069

I never claimed it covered it. You said tell you even one textbook I had to read... this was one. Is that why you asked, so you could try to talk more shit. Figures. Exposing yourself more and more for what you are Rob.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Just pointing out good ol' rob expects every to have a background in what they say is all...

No, Thxone has claimed to be an expert in the field of biology. He is using his claimed education as the reason he “knows” there are no nerves in bone.
Neither Jimi nor I claimed to be experts, but both know that is incorrect. Common knowledge.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I never claimed it covered it. You said tell you even one textbook I had to read... this was one. Is that why you asked, so you could try to talk more shit. Figures. Exposing yourself more and more for what you are Rob.

Ahh, your inability to COMPREHEND (a word you love to bandy about) shows itself again. My words were:
“YOU claimed that all of the info Jimi and I have provided is nothing more than "theory". YOU are the self-proclaimed expert. SHOW us YOUR textbook that says it is nothing more than a theory that there are nerves and pain receptors in bone.”

You then provided the info on a biology textbook that has nothing in it about nerves in bone being simply “theoretical” or a “theory”. Why would you provide your school text that doesn’t prove anything after being asked to provide a book with proof?

And before you type it, no one is going to believe a claim that you were just trying to “control” me and rile me up. Even a complete idiot wouldn’t pretend to be wrong in order to try that scam.