Once again, you “know” something after you made an incorrect post and got corrected.
You probably can predict the past with 100% accuracy, huh?
Interesting statements you have made. You should fact-check yourself before making claims. You were wrong yet again.
“Clinical and experimental observations suggest that bone pain can be derived from noxious stimulation of the periosteum or bone marrow. Sensory neurons are known to innervate the periosteum and marrow cavity, and most of these have a morphology and molecular phenotype consistent with a role in nociception. However, little is known about the physiology of these neurons, and therefore information about mechanisms that generate and maintain bone pain is lacking.”
“Bones
have cells, nerves, blood vessels and pain receptors.”
Go ahead, say medical science got it wrong “because you said so”.
It’s easy to discern what you can or cannot understand when you speak about things incorrectly. When you claim multiple times that I use a word wrong, but I have used it right the definition, I can indeed say
@You don’t understand”. You demonstrate lack of understanding with math too. Examples abound.
Stay in your lane. Argue what you know and can substantiate. The more you wing it and guess, the dumber you look.