What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
“Anything that may access or modify our individually unique genes should be outlawed.”

You just tossed this in because you felt like saying it? ‘Nothing to do with the COVID vaccine and the claims that it is modifying us genetically?
Weird coincidence or timing, for sure.
Why is it always an argument and always with you two? It is a statement. Plain, simple and to my point. It's not a riddle, it's not a fancy play on words, it's not sarcasm, it's a statement. Perhaps if you weren't constantly looking for an argument and weren't constantly on edge waiting for the right trigger words you could just read something and take it for what it is and nothing more.
 
Thanks for clarifying that nothing is modifying my DNA. Not that I remotely said it was.

I made a statement about how I feel about this topic. Not one sentence I posted has anything to do with Buck. However, it's none of your business what I choose to believe or not believe. How about you stop trying to tell people what to do? Seems AN easier theory than trying to continually bend someone to your will. Dontcha think?

You said it bro not me. And what you posted sounds exactly like the conspiracy theory bullshitt that Bucko posts. Why don't you go try and witness a ****. Let me know how that works out for you Thxbuck!
 
You said it bro not me. And what you posted sounds exactly like the conspiracy theory bullshitt that Bucko posts. Why don't you go try and witness a ****. Let me know how that works out for you Thxbuck!

He clarified that it was just a statement and not related to the mRNA vax. I've never seen him suggest the vax should be outlawed or is modifying DNA, so can we just take the guy at his word???
 
He clarified that it was just a statement and not related to the mRNA vax. I've never seen him suggest the vax should be outlawed or is modifying DNA, so can we just take the guy at his word???
Like I said in a post to Rob, it's always AN argument and always with him or Boobytwotits. They are both on edge looking for something to argue about. It's hard to just have a conversation with them and if you have an opinion, yeah, forget about it. The next three pages will be insults and accusations about your opinion. It gets old and they know this. They wear you down with pointless arguing until you tell them off or leave the conversation. Then they claim they won something. In reality all they have won was getting someone fed up because in their mind, they win if they are the last one in the conversation. These are the same people who will just give a young woman money on social media apps. Well, Booby seems that way more than Rob. Beware of that misdirection Boobytwotits... you keep claiming other people are into kiddieporn and **** as much as you do and you are gonna draw attention to yourself. Often those pointing the finger excessively are the ones guilty of said acts. You may want to clean your computers hard drives... I shouldn't say the word HARD to you... your data drives and clear your search history.
 
Like I said in a post to Rob, it's always AN argument and always with him or Boobytwotits. They are both on edge looking for something to argue about. It's hard to just have a conversation with them and if you have an opinion, yeah, forget about it. The next three pages will be insults and accusations about your opinion. It gets old and they know this. They wear you down with pointless arguing until you tell them off or leave the conversation. Then they claim they won something. In reality all they have won was getting someone fed up because in their mind, they win if they are the last one in the conversation. These are the same people who will just give a young woman money on social media apps. Well, Booby seems that way more than Rob. Beware of that misdirection Boobytwotits... you keep claiming other people are into kiddieporn and **** as much as you do and you are gonna draw attention to yourself. Often those pointing the finger excessively are the ones guilty of said acts. You may want to clean your computers hard drives... I shouldn't say the word HARD to you... your data drives and clear your search history.

I prefer to give people some latitude in clarifying what they did or didn't mean. We're all guilty of typos or reading something into another person's post that wasn't there.
 
I prefer to give people some latitude in clarifying what they did or didn't mean. We're all guilty of typos or reading something into another person's post that wasn't there.
100%... I know you can't just blow up at someone or give them shit when you don't fully understand what was said. It seems like these two are making a Caraudio.com career of giving people shit.
 
100%... I know you can't just blow up at someone or give them shit when you don't fully understand what was said. It seems like these two are making a Caraudio.com career of giving people shit.

Dude totally. I’m reading through military documents on bioweapons and getting called a conspiracy theorist. I mean, it’s almost like people don’t understand that eugenics is 1000’s of years old and comes from data on things like hieroglyphs and clay tablets. I’m sure it’s my fault for their ignorance, though. It’s easier to call someone crazy or a conspiracy theorist, that way they don’t have to think outside of their little tiny modern lives.
 
cONsPiraCY THeorISt durrr

“That’s what this is, where you can actually take someone’s DNA, take their medical profile, and you can target a biological weapon that will kill that person or take them off the battlefield or make them inoperable.”

 
‘According to Carus, the United States and the Soviet Union are the only two countries believed to have overcome such challenges enough to be capable of using aerosol releases to reliably disseminate biological weapons over a large area.’

‘Equipment needed for wide-area dispersal may become less necessary, for example, if a pathogen can be engineered to spread faster on its own.’

‘The possible revitalization of state programs requires explicit attention because it is a more multidimensional threat. Not only could state programs produce deadly weapons, but the existence or use of the resulting weapons could trigger conflict, escalation, arms races, and other destabilizing events.’

‘Given recent technological advancements, the consequences of a return to an era of states with biological weapons programs would be devastating.’

‘If the United States is not willing to lead, China has increased its investment in global health over the last decade and might step into the void.’


98FF4D1C-3466-43F3-A475-2D0605C7C2D2.png



81AD2FB0-874B-4D4D-AC4E-968627466AD7.gif
 
Last edited:
I prefer to give people some latitude in clarifying what they did or didn't mean. We're all guilty of typos or reading something into another person's post that wasn't there.
I get it, but Thxone has a solid history of making very clear statements here, then fully backpedaling and claiming he meant something else, was being “metaphorical”, or never actually posted the statement. (He has actually accused me of making up thinks that I have quoted directly from his post.)
And then he calls you a “diick likker” in what he thinks is a hurtful insult.

That kind of behavior makes people far less likely to give any latitude when the BS card could be played…
 
Trust the $cientism 🐍

'The team tested SEND with the CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit specific genes. In CRISPR-Cas9, a short guide RNA sequence helps locate the target gene, and the Cas9 protein makes the cut.

Delivering a large Cas9 cargo into mouse cell lines that expressed a single guide RNA (sgRNA) led to about 60% insertions and deletions in recipient cells, the team reported. Co-packing the Cas9 with the sgRNA using the human SEND system, the scientists reported about 40% edits at a specific location on a chromosome.'

 
Trust the $cientism 🐍

'The team tested SEND with the CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit specific genes. In CRISPR-Cas9, a short guide RNA sequence helps locate the target gene, and the Cas9 protein makes the cut.

Delivering a large Cas9 cargo into mouse cell lines that expressed a single guide RNA (sgRNA) led to about 60% insertions and deletions in recipient cells, the team reported. Co-packing the Cas9 with the sgRNA using the human SEND system, the scientists reported about 40% edits at a specific location on a chromosome.'

NEVER trust science. All that medicine, gravity, electricity, physics…SATANIC I TELL YOU!
Back into the caves with all of us!

Except Buck. Science is ok if it makes his life more comfortable.
 
He clarified that it was just a statement and not related to the mRNA vax. I've never seen him suggest the vax should be outlawed or is modifying DNA, so can we just take the guy at his word???

Then what was it related to? Nothing? Then why did he say it? It's pretty easy to see what he was talking about. Spewing that same BS about modifying our DNA like his butt plug Bucko does.

Screenshot_20220731-144545_Chrome.jpg
 
I get it, but Thxone has a solid history of making very clear statements here, then fully backpedaling and claiming he meant something else, was being “metaphorical”, or never actually posted the statement. (He has actually accused me of making up thinks that I have quoted directly from his post.)
And then he calls you a “diick likker” in what he thinks is a hurtful insult.

That kind of behavior makes people far less likely to give any latitude when the BS card could be played…

Assuming you're correct, then you're just arguing a position he's not going to admit to anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
812,463
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top