Apparently she did since the state doesn't have a **** exception. I'm sure the AG, who should be the expert on the matter, would have brought up that she didn't need to leave the state if there was evidence her life was endangered. I agree her emotional and mental well being were endangered, but everything I've read states that Ohio law says her life must be in jeopardy.
Here's the problem with the pro-life crowd. They just can't admit when they're wrong. Of course there should be fuccing exceptions for **** and ****** but they won't admit it. Texas's civil enforcement of an abortion ban is so wrought with issues that clearly Texas should walk that back in light of Roe v Wade being overturned, but the won't. Colorado is going to become an abortion safe haven and we all know every one of her sister states will sue her and we know arrest warrants will be issued for Colorado docs who perform abortions for out of staters. So much for states rights
Q & A: What we know about case of 10-year-old Ohio girl who sought abortion in Indiana
What we know about the case of a 10-year-old ****** assault victim who had an abortion in Indiana after Ohio's "heartbeat law" took effect.
www.dispatch.com
Here's a pretty good recap of the whole story...even without a **** exception and the 6 week ban...she would've qualified under the risk of health...
