Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="adulbrich" data-source="post: 8379919" data-attributes="member: 661255">Lately, I don&#039;t have a ton of time. Got a few track meets the net couple days. Work a few nights too. Also, I&#039;d like to do some work on my build when it&#039;s light outside.I doubt all their amps do over rated. I know they have decent amps, but nothing special except the Warhorse, imo.Are those speakers? No way a 1 inch coil can handle 300 watts continuously.DD is pricey, and that&#039;s why people hate on them. It happens.Well, I want to run 5k to each sub eventually..Boss/pyle/lanzar/ect. all cater to the normal guy who wants a little bass.Like Martin said, there are plenty of crappy brands that have survived the test of time. They just make there stuff in china and put bigger numbers on the box.Literally every time someone talks bad about SQ on here, everyone gives them shit. I&#039;m sick of it. Was hoping to keep this thread about Kicker, not Soundqubed. Yes, SQ is a budget brand. Are they the best stuff out there? I don&#039;t think so. Am I saying everyone should go buy DD or Sundown? Hell no. Is there one brand that is good quality, beefy, looks good, efficient, high power, and cheap? No.Was hoping not to get into the SQ thing. That&#039;s why I included them.First time I&#039;ve ever gotten shit for defending SQ, and no nuthuggers stepped up to be like &quot;yea, they&#039;re good stuff&quot;. I bet after I post this, they&#039;re going to be pissed. I don&#039;t really care anymore/SQ rant.This^Square waves count, right? LolThe lower lines, no. The HDS2 is a cheap sub line. It is what it is.HDC3&#039;s and 4&#039;s look decent, but not beefy enough for me. Selling my SQ pro 6.5&#039;s to Adam on here local, because I haven&#039;t seen Big Scott on here for a while.I would not run their amps, which everyone goes crazy for. They really aren&#039;t a great deal for the money, imo.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="adulbrich, post: 8379919, member: 661255"] Lately, I don't have a ton of time. Got a few track meets the net couple days. Work a few nights too. Also, I'd like to do some work on my build when it's light outside. I doubt all their amps do over rated. I know they have decent amps, but nothing special except the Warhorse, imo. Are those speakers? No way a 1 inch coil can handle 300 watts continuously. DD is pricey, and that's why people hate on them. It happens. Well, I want to run 5k to each sub eventually.. Boss/pyle/lanzar/ect. all cater to the normal guy who wants a little bass. Like Martin said, there are plenty of crappy brands that have survived the test of time. They just make there stuff in china and put bigger numbers on the box. Literally every time someone talks bad about SQ on here, everyone gives them sh[COLOR=black]i[/COLOR]t. I'm sick of it. Was hoping to keep this thread about Kicker, not Soundqubed. Yes, SQ is a budget brand. Are they the best stuff out there? I don't think so. Am I saying everyone should go buy DD or Sundown? Hell no. Is there one brand that is good quality, beefy, looks good, efficient, high power, and cheap? No. Was hoping not to get into the SQ thing. That's why I included them. First time I've ever gotten s[COLOR=black]hi[/COLOR]t for defending SQ, and no nuthuggers stepped up to be like "yea, they're good stuff". I bet after I post this, they're going to be pi[COLOR=black]ss[/COLOR]ed. I don't really care anymore /SQ rant. This^ Square waves count, right? Lol The lower lines, no. The HDS2 is a cheap sub line. It is what it is. HDC3's and 4's look decent, but not beefy enough for me. Selling my SQ pro 6.5's to Adam on here local, because I haven't seen Big Scott on here for a while. I would not run their amps, which everyone goes crazy for. They really aren't a great deal for the money, imo. [/QUOTE]

Verification