Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
?=xxx
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 1099836" data-attributes="member: 555320"><p>Not really. Yes, the XXX outdisplaces them both. But not by a whole hell of a lot. Sheer output wise the XXX will likely get a little louder to the ear (at best). Sound quality wise; well, that's subjective. I know some people who love the XXX, and other people who'd never own one a million years. But, in general, any one of them have the ability to sound good to the relative listener and have very close to the same overall output. I presently have the Rl-p and love it to death.</p><p></p><p>As to RMS.....well, personally I'd <em>prefer</em> a sub that doesn't need 1600w to get loud and sound good //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As mentioned...mainly proto's only at this point. A guy named Electrodynamic has some TC proto's/one-offs up for in the classifieds section. Based on the TC3HP. Something to check out......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 1099836, member: 555320"] Not really. Yes, the XXX outdisplaces them both. But not by a whole hell of a lot. Sheer output wise the XXX will likely get a little louder to the ear (at best). Sound quality wise; well, that's subjective. I know some people who love the XXX, and other people who'd never own one a million years. But, in general, any one of them have the ability to sound good to the relative listener and have very close to the same overall output. I presently have the Rl-p and love it to death. As to RMS.....well, personally I'd [I]prefer[/I] a sub that doesn't need 1600w to get loud and sound good [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] Nope. As mentioned...mainly proto's only at this point. A guy named Electrodynamic has some TC proto's/one-offs up for in the classifieds section. Based on the TC3HP. Something to check out...... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
?=xxx
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list