Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 2752496" data-attributes="member: 549629">Sound Quality is not subjective. Is water quality subjective? How about air quality? These are measureable quantities. The accuracy of the reproduction of the original recording, that is sound quality. But, our means for measuring it many times IS subjective. Add to that the notion everyone should be able to individually determine what &#039;sound quality&#039; is based on their own personal preferences, and you have yourself one miscontrued term.Again, I personally prefer the sound of my IDQ&#039;s to my XXX&#039;s. But I wont try and fool myself into believing the IDQ&#039;s are technically more accurate. That&#039;s exactly what some of you guys are attempting to do here.Lets not start comparing &#039;output levels&#039; of various types motors, many times that&#039;s a function of the particular design, enclosure size/type/alignment etc... not necessarily the motor topology.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 2752496, member: 549629"] Sound Quality is not subjective. Is water quality subjective? How about air quality? These are measureable quantities. The accuracy of the reproduction of the original recording, that is sound quality. But, our means for measuring it many times IS subjective. Add to that the notion everyone should be able to individually determine what 'sound quality' is based on their own personal preferences, and you have yourself one miscontrued term. Again, I personally prefer the sound of my IDQ's to my XXX's. But I wont try and fool myself into believing the IDQ's are technically more accurate. That's exactly what some of you guys are attempting to do here. Lets not start comparing 'output levels' of various types motors, many times that's a function of the particular design, enclosure size/type/alignment etc... not necessarily the motor topology. [/QUOTE]

Verification