Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
XXX vs. MX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newusername" data-source="post: 2749945" data-attributes="member: 562064"><p>1. For someone who behaves as if you have a great grasp on motor topologies, why would you make such a bad blanket statement? "split coil = better then XBL^2 for More power and getting louder." Sure, that's true if there's more coil than on the XBL^2 motor that's being compared. It certainly doesn't make for a great blanket statement. Look at the other positives that make XBL^2 a much better topology than split coil.</p><p></p><p>2. SQ is not subjective; sonic preference is. A speaker that accurately reproduces the input signal is an "SQ" speaker (god I hate that term) and no audible interpretation can change that. A speaker that sounds good but fails to produce the input signal accurately is NOT an "SQ" speaker.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newusername, post: 2749945, member: 562064"] 1. For someone who behaves as if you have a great grasp on motor topologies, why would you make such a bad blanket statement? "split coil = better then XBL^2 for More power and getting louder." Sure, that's true if there's more coil than on the XBL^2 motor that's being compared. It certainly doesn't make for a great blanket statement. Look at the other positives that make XBL^2 a much better topology than split coil. 2. SQ is not subjective; sonic preference is. A speaker that accurately reproduces the input signal is an "SQ" speaker (god I hate that term) and no audible interpretation can change that. A speaker that sounds good but fails to produce the input signal accurately is NOT an "SQ" speaker. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
XXX vs. MX
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list