Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
XXX vs. MX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warbleed" data-source="post: 2748954" data-attributes="member: 549898"><p>The XXX will have lower distortion at just about ANY output level. Remember, what woofer you LIKE, and which has less distortion aren't necessarily the same thing, if your ego is willing to concede that, which it probably isn't.</p><p></p><p>For ANY musical application, given even remotely similar displacement levels, I'll always take the driver with lower BL distortion. Remember Ryan, BL distortion = 70%+ of ALL loudspeaker distortion. Given that we are comparing a standard overhung driver with a 22mm xmax to an XBL^2 driver with 32mm of xmax, it's not difficult to figure out which drivers comes out ahead in terms of distortion or output.</p><p></p><p>As far as why I mention displacement difference, even if the MX DID use a flat BL technology for the motor and coil design, it still has about 50% less displacement than the XXX, so it would still end up with higher overall distortion at most output levels. I thought that was fairly obvious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warbleed, post: 2748954, member: 549898"] The XXX will have lower distortion at just about ANY output level. Remember, what woofer you LIKE, and which has less distortion aren't necessarily the same thing, if your ego is willing to concede that, which it probably isn't. For ANY musical application, given even remotely similar displacement levels, I'll always take the driver with lower BL distortion. Remember Ryan, BL distortion = 70%+ of ALL loudspeaker distortion. Given that we are comparing a standard overhung driver with a 22mm xmax to an XBL^2 driver with 32mm of xmax, it's not difficult to figure out which drivers comes out ahead in terms of distortion or output. As far as why I mention displacement difference, even if the MX DID use a flat BL technology for the motor and coil design, it still has about 50% less displacement than the XXX, so it would still end up with higher overall distortion at most output levels. I thought that was fairly obvious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
XXX vs. MX
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list