Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ngsm13" data-source="post: 654917" data-attributes="member: 544830">Specs again, and coupled along with such a stron and meaningful word as &quot;SHOULD&quot;. What i&#039;m saying is, i don&#039;t care what the specs &quot;SHOULD&quot; show...it&#039;s NEVER been shown in real life...ever. Even if my side has only been shown ONCE...that&#039;s still more than anything you are trying to prove. I&#039;ll research even more, and try to get some other solid tests...if RE ever answers my e-mails. Also, i&#039;m not going to the &quot;Nth&quot; degree just to satisfy your concrete mind.Again, ANOTHER &quot;specs&quot; and &quot;SHOULD&quot; reference. The RMS on the XXX is 1600...so it was at least over the RMS. But seriously...whatever, i think what your trying to say is if we should push the SX the same percentage over it&#039;s limits as the XXX...for example you might be suggesting to supply the SX with with 1400 watts rms while (40% past assumed rms) and the XXX with 2240 (40% past assumed rms)...are you saying that is a fair test? Because that&#039;s what it seems like to me. (I may certainly be wrong in what you&#039;re trying to assert). Well, obviously the XXX MAY be louder tan the SX in that situation. All i am saying is, i will put my money on the SX any day of the week in a straight up exact head to head battle. (Same box, install, power). I never tried to say you wanted to bet...i was telling you with confidence that IF I WAS A BETTING MAN...i would put my money on the SX any day of the week (as stated above.)Also, as i stated before...Peace!NG</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ngsm13, post: 654917, member: 544830"] Specs again, and coupled along with such a stron and meaningful word as "SHOULD". What i'm saying is, i don't care what the specs "SHOULD" show...it's NEVER been shown in real life...ever. Even if my side has only been shown ONCE...that's still more than anything you are trying to prove. I'll research even more, and try to get some other solid tests...if RE ever answers my e-mails. Also, i'm not going to the "Nth" degree just to satisfy your concrete mind. Again, ANOTHER "specs" and "SHOULD" reference. The RMS on the XXX is 1600...so it was at least over the RMS. But seriously...whatever, i think what your trying to say is if we should push the SX the same percentage over it's limits as the XXX...for example you might be suggesting to supply the SX with with 1400 watts rms while (40% past assumed rms) and the XXX with 2240 (40% past assumed rms)...are you saying that is a fair test? Because that's what it seems like to me. (I may certainly be wrong in what you're trying to assert). Well, obviously the XXX MAY be louder tan the SX in that situation. All i am saying is, i will put my money on the SX any day of the week in a straight up exact head to head battle. (Same box, install, power). I never tried to say you wanted to bet...i was telling you with confidence that IF I WAS A BETTING MAN...i would put my money on the SX any day of the week (as stated above.) Also, as i stated before... Peace! NG [/QUOTE]

Verification