Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7339567" data-attributes="member: 549629">You&#039;ve answered your own question about my reply... peak-to-peak. The OP&#039;s question was is there any production sub with more xmax/excursion than a XXX, the answer is no. And the RFL, with its peak-to-peak spec clearly puts it nowhere close to a XXX.That 4.35&quot; of excursion figure is not only peak-to-peak (so you can cut it in half to compare it to other subs made by manufacturers who dont publish bullshit specs to make their product look better), its probably also xmech doubled (since its pretty much an SPL-only sub where xmech is more important than xmax) so you can chop even more off that figure before you halve it.Hope that clears up my earlier, more abrupt reply.I agree. But that has nothing to do with its excursion potential, which is what this discussion is about.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7339567, member: 549629"] You've answered your own question about my reply... peak-to-peak. The OP's question was is there any production sub with more xmax/excursion than a XXX, the answer is no. And the RFL, with its peak-to-peak spec clearly puts it nowhere close to a XXX. That 4.35" of excursion figure is not only peak-to-peak (so you can cut it in half to compare it to other subs made by manufacturers who dont publish bullshi[COLOR=black]t[/COLOR] specs to make their product look better), its probably also xmech doubled (since its pretty much an SPL-only sub where xmech is more important than xmax) so you can chop even more off that figure before you halve it. Hope that clears up my earlier, more abrupt reply. I agree. But that has nothing to do with its excursion potential, which is what this discussion is about. [/QUOTE]

Verification