Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="sundownz" data-source="post: 8151270" data-attributes="member: 549523">X = 1250 RMS* 4-layer CCAW Round Wire Coil* 4-layer spider pack* 190mm x 66mm magnet stack (50mm mech clearance)* 15mm top plate thickness* 55-58mm long coil depending on impedanceZ v.4 = 1750 RMS* 8-layer Aluminum Flat Wire Coil* 5-layer spider pack* 220mm x 75mm magnet stack (62.5mm mech clearance)* 30mm top plate thickness* 65mm long coil winding-----They perform very similarly on the bottom end up to the limits of the X; the Z v.4 has a higher limit.The Z v.4 also features double shorting rings vs. a single pole cap ring on the X series -- so lower inductance and less inductance induced distortion on the Z v.4 series.Neither is a slouch -- but the Z v.4 is beefed up across the board //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="sundownz, post: 8151270, member: 549523"] X = 1250 RMS * 4-layer CCAW Round Wire Coil * 4-layer spider pack * 190mm x 66mm magnet stack (50mm mech clearance) * 15mm top plate thickness * 55-58mm long coil depending on impedance Z v.4 = 1750 RMS * 8-layer Aluminum Flat Wire Coil * 5-layer spider pack * 220mm x 75mm magnet stack (62.5mm mech clearance) * 30mm top plate thickness * 65mm long coil winding ----- They perform very similarly on the bottom end up to the limits of the X; the Z v.4 has a higher limit. The Z v.4 also features double shorting rings vs. a single pole cap ring on the X series -- so lower inductance and less inductance induced distortion on the Z v.4 series. Neither is a slouch -- but the Z v.4 is beefed up across the board [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification