Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="req" data-source="post: 579236" data-attributes="member: 555713">good deal. ill try and see if i can make the box a little bigger for the 2.5^3... i hope she dosnt get upset with a huge box =Pi might have to go smaller but sealed //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/bawling.gif.6287aa5d1d447c8af063fc9466e822ef.gifoh well. they will still be a TON of thump for her.thanks a TON jmac. ill have to download bbp6&nbsp; //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/blush.gif.99bc659ee2012b7d826165e26fb5eebe.gifnow ill get to work on a 2.5^3 net wedge + .06ft^3 (or 113.04in^3) of port displacement. (2.56ft^3 + sub dispacement)i would go with the 2 3&quot; ports for more port area, but i dont think i have that kind of depth to work with. maybe i can angle the front face and come up with it. we&#039;ll see.shouldnt be too hard - i just have to get the angle on the back correct.WEEE! build time this weekend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="req, post: 579236, member: 555713"] good deal. ill try and see if i can make the box a little bigger for the 2.5^3... i hope she dosnt get upset with a huge box =P i might have to go smaller but sealed [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/bawling.gif.6287aa5d1d447c8af063fc9466e822ef.gif[/IMG] oh well. they will still be a TON of thump for her. thanks a TON jmac. ill have to download bbp6 [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/blush.gif.99bc659ee2012b7d826165e26fb5eebe.gif[/IMG] now ill get to work on a 2.5^3 net wedge + .06ft^3 (or 113.04in^3) of port displacement. (2.56ft^3 + sub dispacement) i would go with the 2 3" ports for more port area, but i dont think i have that kind of depth to work with. maybe i can angle the front face and come up with it. we'll see. shouldnt be too hard - i just have to get the angle on the back correct. WEEE! build time this weekend. [/QUOTE]

Verification