Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
why is efficiency so critical
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CBFryman2" data-source="post: 2129788" data-attributes="member: 565445"><p>Which is the main problem with SPL ratings. If there was a standard frequincy for each type of driver and they did a real world anecho testing 1w/1m then it would be a far greater judge. Drivers that are rated at 89dB 1w/1m correctly could prove to be 70dB 1w/1m at 40Hz... in a range where it actually will play.</p><p></p><p>Prime example would be audiobahn. Not only do these drivers have a 98dB 8w/1m but they also have this uncanny ability to play louder above 100Hz as well, where less displacement and power is needed to get equally loud.</p><p></p><p>And jsut choosing one frequincy would be unfair for some drivers. Average for a frequincy range would be better.</p><p></p><p>But in the end a higher efficency will yeild a higher SPL number at some point as it should be the loudest it can get...no particualr range or frequincy (IIRC). But that doesnt matter once you put it in a box in a car with more than one watt and most importantly, in a given frequincy range.</p><p></p><p>So what am I saying in my rableing? Both points of viewing the issue are correct. Which is more correct is another issue to be discussed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CBFryman2, post: 2129788, member: 565445"] Which is the main problem with SPL ratings. If there was a standard frequincy for each type of driver and they did a real world anecho testing 1w/1m then it would be a far greater judge. Drivers that are rated at 89dB 1w/1m correctly could prove to be 70dB 1w/1m at 40Hz... in a range where it actually will play. Prime example would be audiobahn. Not only do these drivers have a 98dB 8w/1m but they also have this uncanny ability to play louder above 100Hz as well, where less displacement and power is needed to get equally loud. And jsut choosing one frequincy would be unfair for some drivers. Average for a frequincy range would be better. But in the end a higher efficency will yeild a higher SPL number at some point as it should be the loudest it can get...no particualr range or frequincy (IIRC). But that doesnt matter once you put it in a box in a car with more than one watt and most importantly, in a given frequincy range. So what am I saying in my rableing? Both points of viewing the issue are correct. Which is more correct is another issue to be discussed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
why is efficiency so critical
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list