Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6329350" data-attributes="member: 549629">Yes, your understanding of &#039;speaker physics&#039; is so amazing that its too busy being used by Nasa to even post one shred of information about how Im so obviously wrong. I guess the left side of your brain is far too busy with the Nasa people, only leaving the right side of your brain to deal with little old me. So tell me, tell all of us Mr Toocockytoevengiveananswer... how does power handling NOT relate to speaker efficiency. That&#039;s obviously what you and your vast knowledge of &#039;speaker physics&#039; is implying, so put your money where your mouth is. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/idea.gif.5acb6a39a9b92425414c316dda202bad.gif But we both know you wont, you will instead try to focus on me, as you have done this entire thread. frankly, your misunderstanding of the difference between speaker efficiency and system efficiency tells me your experience with &#039;speaker physics&#039; is limited, at best. Tell you what, I&#039;ll get you started, try this... <a href="http://www.wikipedia.com." target="_blank">http://www.wikipedia.com.</a> //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifOhhhhh, its &quot;but one example&quot; of things to focus on before increasing power. Gosh, what a great thing to bring up in a thread discussing something completely different! lol Why dont we mention the paint job on the insides of the ports, since we are bringing up topics completely unrelated to the discussion at hand. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifOh Ive noticed, this was merely the first time it was so blatant that it was worthy of my time replying. Again, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. So i guess I should have been flattered all along. Nice knowing my comments bothered you so much that you tried using them back on me. I didn&#039;t set out to bruise your feelings in this thread, btu I have to admit, its been a nice by-product of this discussion.wheeeee!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6329350, member: 549629"] Yes, your understanding of 'speaker physics' is so amazing that its too busy being used by Nasa to even post one shred of information about how Im so obviously wrong. I guess the left side of your brain is far too busy with the Nasa people, only leaving the right side of your brain to deal with little old me. So tell me, tell all of us Mr Toocockytoevengiveananswer... how does power handling NOT relate to speaker efficiency. That's obviously what you and your vast knowledge of 'speaker physics' is implying, so put your money where your mouth is. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/idea.gif.5acb6a39a9b92425414c316dda202bad.gif[/IMG] But we both know you wont, you will instead try to focus on me, as you have done this entire thread. frankly, your misunderstanding of the difference between speaker efficiency and system efficiency tells me your experience with 'speaker physics' is limited, at best. Tell you what, I'll get you started, try this... [URL="http://www.wikipedia.com."]http://www.wikipedia.com.[/URL] [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] Ohhhhh, its "but one example" of things to focus on before increasing power. Gosh, what a great thing to bring up in a thread discussing something completely different! lol Why dont we mention the paint job on the insides of the ports, since we are bringing up topics completely unrelated to the discussion at hand. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] Oh Ive noticed, this was merely the first time it was so blatant that it was worthy of my time replying. Again, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. So i guess I should have been flattered all along. Nice knowing my comments bothered you so much that you tried using them back on me. I didn't set out to bruise your feelings in this thread, btu I have to admit, its been a nice by-product of this discussion. wheeeee! [/QUOTE]

Verification