Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
who did you vote for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hispls" data-source="post: 8530703" data-attributes="member: 614752"><p>Perhaps if you SJW types called him names louder and more fanatically this never would have happened? Your use of those Marxist agitprop buzzwords lost you what little respect I had for you.</p><p></p><p>Your kind has used these make-believe words in place of rational discussion for far too long and frankly us normal folks are sick of it and all your special victim cards have lost their edge as being scarlet letters. Your kind has become the boy who cries wolf and nobody is listening to these cries anymore.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh no, please don't throw me in that briar patch. I'm quite confident that with the trillions we give all those ingrates in foreign aid every year we'll manage just fine without them, and if our troops aren't out fighting their wars and protecting their borders they can focus on keeping our own shores safe from invasion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hardly. We have bountiful natural and human resources here, we are a net exporter of food, have ample water, and control the resources to be energy independent if needed. What do we risk losing really? Cheap slave made goods from third world sweatshops? We made all those things here and better not long ago. Some luxury goods from abroad? I can assure you we could do without.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? Just step back and think about what you just wrote. A handful of cotton and tobacco farmers didn't build our nation I can assure you. Those were important regional industries certainly but in absence of Africans they'd have made do just fine (as the factories in the north did) with European laborers. If you actually research the conditions of factories during the industrial revolution you'd find that that form of labor was even cheaper than slavery. If factory worker loses an arm they're out of a job starving, if a slave is maimed you still take care of him for the rest of his or her life, and the standard of living, work hours, and general quality of life was horrendous before the advent of unions.</p><p></p><p>Take your anti-white bullshit and cultural Marxism over to HuffPo, apart from starry eyed liberal arts major college students and boomers who haven't grown up and still think it's the early 60's nobody is listening to that manure any longer.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, real or not, Trump was put out by his party, the "opposition" party, AND the media as an anti-establishment candidate while Hillary was seen largely as a party hack who's policies and bedfellows were no different than the last 20 years of neo-con globalists. The anti-cultural Marxist, anti-establishment, and nationalistic sentiment among the people is very real and was expressed Tuesday. Look at the electoral map, Outside of a few cuckolded Marxist stronghold cities people are just generally sick of this *****.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hispls, post: 8530703, member: 614752"] Perhaps if you SJW types called him names louder and more fanatically this never would have happened? Your use of those Marxist agitprop buzzwords lost you what little respect I had for you. Your kind has used these make-believe words in place of rational discussion for far too long and frankly us normal folks are sick of it and all your special victim cards have lost their edge as being scarlet letters. Your kind has become the boy who cries wolf and nobody is listening to these cries anymore. Oh no, please don't throw me in that briar patch. I'm quite confident that with the trillions we give all those ingrates in foreign aid every year we'll manage just fine without them, and if our troops aren't out fighting their wars and protecting their borders they can focus on keeping our own shores safe from invasion. Hardly. We have bountiful natural and human resources here, we are a net exporter of food, have ample water, and control the resources to be energy independent if needed. What do we risk losing really? Cheap slave made goods from third world sweatshops? We made all those things here and better not long ago. Some luxury goods from abroad? I can assure you we could do without. Really? Just step back and think about what you just wrote. A handful of cotton and tobacco farmers didn't build our nation I can assure you. Those were important regional industries certainly but in absence of Africans they'd have made do just fine (as the factories in the north did) with European laborers. If you actually research the conditions of factories during the industrial revolution you'd find that that form of labor was even cheaper than slavery. If factory worker loses an arm they're out of a job starving, if a slave is maimed you still take care of him for the rest of his or her life, and the standard of living, work hours, and general quality of life was horrendous before the advent of unions. Take your anti-white bullshit and cultural Marxism over to HuffPo, apart from starry eyed liberal arts major college students and boomers who haven't grown up and still think it's the early 60's nobody is listening to that manure any longer. Lastly, real or not, Trump was put out by his party, the "opposition" party, AND the media as an anti-establishment candidate while Hillary was seen largely as a party hack who's policies and bedfellows were no different than the last 20 years of neo-con globalists. The anti-cultural Marxist, anti-establishment, and nationalistic sentiment among the people is very real and was expressed Tuesday. Look at the electoral map, Outside of a few cuckolded Marxist stronghold cities people are just generally sick of this *****. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
who did you vote for?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list