Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
What's wrong with this amp? PICS inside
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="midnightg35x" data-source="post: 6169988" data-attributes="member: 608400"><p>I guess to me that still seems a little less likely to me. How does the ground line get driven high to burn out like that on the 494? If the drive transistors along with the output fets failed, then all the power should be handled along the normal ground plane and the ground wire hooked up to the amp, not through the 494. To go through the 494's ground pin (like in the picture), the resistance of the +12V to ground internal to the 494 would have to be lower than the resistance of the direct short (due to blown transistors) between +12V and ground on the FET's. Also, the SMPS transformer isolates the drive transistors from the 494.</p><p></p><p>Now if all transistors blew and the smps transformer saturated (broke) I could maybe believe it would do that because the SMPS fets might draw more current from their gates than the 494 could handle before those SMPS fets blew. I think its much more common for a ground to be loose or a bad connection somewhere compared to the above scenario happening. It is POSSIBLE, but I say start with the more probable option.</p><p></p><p>I agree with your posts about using either a small supply to test it or a supply with a good overcurrent protection.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="midnightg35x, post: 6169988, member: 608400"] I guess to me that still seems a little less likely to me. How does the ground line get driven high to burn out like that on the 494? If the drive transistors along with the output fets failed, then all the power should be handled along the normal ground plane and the ground wire hooked up to the amp, not through the 494. To go through the 494's ground pin (like in the picture), the resistance of the +12V to ground internal to the 494 would have to be lower than the resistance of the direct short (due to blown transistors) between +12V and ground on the FET's. Also, the SMPS transformer isolates the drive transistors from the 494. Now if all transistors blew and the smps transformer saturated (broke) I could maybe believe it would do that because the SMPS fets might draw more current from their gates than the 494 could handle before those SMPS fets blew. I think its much more common for a ground to be loose or a bad connection somewhere compared to the above scenario happening. It is POSSIBLE, but I say start with the more probable option. I agree with your posts about using either a small supply to test it or a supply with a good overcurrent protection. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
What's wrong with this amp? PICS inside
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list