Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pro-rabbit" data-source="post: 7917670" data-attributes="member: 551878"><p>To be honest it is not even close to accurate and if you follow that method you will be upset thing you should be doing 150's+ and you are only donig a 140 at best. This is where math will end up being very very wrong do to imperfections in the "real world" causing variances that are not accounted for in such a basic algorithm.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Top