Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
What should the New subs BE??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zane" data-source="post: 10005" data-attributes="member: 540617"><p>with the luck you had with your Solo- and the way that you were treated by the retailer on kickers behalf. I think the elimination of the Kickers all together would be a logical and wise decision.</p><p></p><p>Leaving the choices with the HX2, the W3, or the Alumapros.</p><p></p><p>All would do quite well providing a solid low end. It is fairly obvious that the JL and the Alumapro would offer far better SQ while doing so though.</p><p></p><p>Which Alumapros were you looking at? The Alchemy's or the Alusonics?</p><p></p><p>Personally, I would choose the Alumapro Alchemy's firstly due to thier cone and thier motor design. That, and the fact that they impressed me more than the JL's did with thier speed and accuracy. The low end extension is phenominal on these things; even at 30Hz- there is virtually zero break up.</p><p></p><p>I'd say, have a listen to the W3 and the Alchemy side by side and choose which ever of the two impresses you more. If nothing else, it should be a very interesting comparrison!</p><p></p><p>take it easy,</p><p></p><p>-zane</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zane, post: 10005, member: 540617"] with the luck you had with your Solo- and the way that you were treated by the retailer on kickers behalf. I think the elimination of the Kickers all together would be a logical and wise decision. Leaving the choices with the HX2, the W3, or the Alumapros. All would do quite well providing a solid low end. It is fairly obvious that the JL and the Alumapro would offer far better SQ while doing so though. Which Alumapros were you looking at? The Alchemy's or the Alusonics? Personally, I would choose the Alumapro Alchemy's firstly due to thier cone and thier motor design. That, and the fact that they impressed me more than the JL's did with thier speed and accuracy. The low end extension is phenominal on these things; even at 30Hz- there is virtually zero break up. I'd say, have a listen to the W3 and the Alchemy side by side and choose which ever of the two impresses you more. If nothing else, it should be a very interesting comparrison! take it easy, -zane [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
What should the New subs BE??
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list