Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7073142" data-attributes="member: 549629">If you were any more dense, you&#039;d collapse in on yourself and form a black hole.Ive asked you, numerous times, if its fair to assume that testing positive for marijuana means it will affect their job performance. In other words, proving they use it means its fair to assume they&#039;ll use it at work. But you just cant get your brain off of the circular logic that if its legal, they wont test for it. Ive tried to explain to you that my question isn&#039;t about if its legal or not, but if its fair to make this assumption. But you just keep coming back to &#039;if its legal, they wouldn&#039;t test for it&#039;. The only reason Ive said &#039;assume its legal&#039; was not to interject it into my question on fairness, but to try and get you to stop telling us about its legal status (ie: its illegal, so its &#039;fair&#039; to test for it)Lets review your questions.1) Only in the sense of, you wont get off the &#039;its an illegal drug so they have a right to test you for it&#039; logic. Not in the sense of &#039;is it fair to test for pot if its legal&#039;. Am I getting through to you, at all, yet?2) Not relevant to &#039;is it fair to assume use means use at/during work&#039;, or if the residual affects of smoking last Friday, or even the night before, will somehow make you inherently less capable of doing your job than someone else who does not or never has smoked it.3) Again, my question of fairness, posed to you, has NEVER been &#039;is it fair to test for marijuana if its legalized&#039;.And my own #4: 4) You are a perfect example of a drug free mind does not imply a clear thinker.Fucking duh. lol</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7073142, member: 549629"] If you were any more dense, you'd collapse in on yourself and form a black hole. Ive asked you, numerous times, if its fair to assume that testing positive for marijuana means it will affect their job performance. In other words, proving they use it means its fair to assume they'll use it at work. But you just cant get your brain off of the circular logic that if its legal, they wont test for it. Ive tried to explain to you that my question isn't about if its legal or not, but if its fair to make this assumption. But you just keep coming back to 'if its legal, they wouldn't test for it'. The only reason Ive said 'assume its legal' was not to interject it into my question on fairness, but to try and get you to stop telling us about its legal status (ie: its illegal, so its 'fair' to test for it) Lets review your questions. 1) Only in the sense of, you wont get off the 'its an illegal drug so they have a right to test you for it' logic. Not in the sense of 'is it fair to test for pot if its legal'. Am I getting through to you, at all, yet? 2) Not relevant to 'is it fair to assume use means use at/during work', or if the residual affects of smoking last Friday, or even the night before, will somehow make you inherently less capable of doing your job than someone else who does not or never has smoked it. 3) Again, my question of fairness, posed to you, has NEVER been 'is it fair to test for marijuana if its legalized'. And my own #4: 4) You are a perfect example of a drug free mind does not imply a clear thinker. F[COLOR=black]u[/COLOR]cking duh. lol [/QUOTE]

Verification