Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
We are F*UCKED!!!!!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zane" data-source="post: 592452" data-attributes="member: 540617"><p>As can I, and last I checked, I'm still a few up on you. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p><p></p><p>The reality is that the Bush Administration did accept the findings of Hans Blix in his report to the UN Security Council. Many other Americans, did not.</p><p></p><p>Hans Blix was later found not to be the most credible person to fill the role of Chief UN Weapons Inspector for Iraq.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/hansirrelevant.htm" target="_blank">http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/hansirrelevant.htm</a></p><p></p><p>This holds even more true for a weapons site recently found in Iraq near Al-Qaqaa.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/usatoday/20041029/ts_usatoday/usnixestheoryonmissingweapons" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/usatoday/20041029/ts_usatoday/usnixestheoryonmissingweapons</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hrmm, Justified.</p><p></p><p>A tyranical dictator with a long history of abusing, torturing, and executing, Iraqi Citizens, is no longer in power.</p><p></p><p>No more mass executions for Iraqi People.</p><p></p><p>No more torture chambers.</p><p></p><p>No more Chemical Abuse of Iraqi People.</p><p></p><p>No more suppression of Iraqi People.</p><p></p><p>Iraqi Citizens are now free. They will be voting, yes, you heard that right, voting for their new leaders in January of next year.</p><p></p><p>Have Iraqi Citizens ever had freedom? Elected their own leaders without fear?</p><p></p><p>Finally, How many UN Resolutions are really necessary before we act?</p><p></p><p>The state department lists 17 United Nations Security Council Resolutions that Saddam Hussein was in violation of.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/14906.htm" target="_blank">http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/14906.htm</a></p><p></p><p>The White House lists 16 United Nations Security Council Resolutions that Saddam Hussein was in violation of.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/decade/sect2.html" target="_blank">http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/decade/sect2.html</a></p><p></p><p>These resolutions were set in place to ensure that Saddam Hussein would not pose a threat to the world.</p><p></p><p>As he was found in violation of all of the above resolutions, he was a threat.</p><p></p><p>Considering he had well over 10 years to comply with these resolutions, he had more than ample time to do so, or manipulate things futher.</p><p></p><p>If this one doesn't cook your cookie, then it's very obvious that you also pick and choose despite actual fact.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/13456.htm" target="_blank">http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/13456.htm</a></p><p></p><p>In your world, Saddam Hussein would still be in power, Millions of Iraqi Citizens would still be killed and tortured by their own ruthless dictator. There would be no freedom for the people of Iraq, and they certainly would not be able to elect their own leaders without fear. Iraq would continue to persue and obtain Chemical, Biological, and Nuclear Weapons, and in the hands of it's Dictator, Saddam Hussein; a delusional person bent on conquering other countries to expand his control (as proven in the Gulf War), and would eventually turn them on the United States, Great Brittain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and any other nation, as they see fit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zane, post: 592452, member: 540617"] As can I, and last I checked, I'm still a few up on you. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] The reality is that the Bush Administration did accept the findings of Hans Blix in his report to the UN Security Council. Many other Americans, did not. Hans Blix was later found not to be the most credible person to fill the role of Chief UN Weapons Inspector for Iraq. [URL="http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/hansirrelevant.htm"]http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/hansirrelevant.htm[/URL] This holds even more true for a weapons site recently found in Iraq near Al-Qaqaa. [URL="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/20041029/ts_usatoday/usnixestheoryonmissingweapons"]http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/20041029/ts_usatoday/usnixestheoryonmissingweapons[/URL] Hrmm, Justified. A tyranical dictator with a long history of abusing, torturing, and executing, Iraqi Citizens, is no longer in power. No more mass executions for Iraqi People. No more torture chambers. No more Chemical Abuse of Iraqi People. No more suppression of Iraqi People. Iraqi Citizens are now free. They will be voting, yes, you heard that right, voting for their new leaders in January of next year. Have Iraqi Citizens ever had freedom? Elected their own leaders without fear? Finally, How many UN Resolutions are really necessary before we act? The state department lists 17 United Nations Security Council Resolutions that Saddam Hussein was in violation of. [URL="http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/14906.htm"]http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/14906.htm[/URL] The White House lists 16 United Nations Security Council Resolutions that Saddam Hussein was in violation of. [URL="http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/decade/sect2.html"]http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/decade/sect2.html[/URL] These resolutions were set in place to ensure that Saddam Hussein would not pose a threat to the world. As he was found in violation of all of the above resolutions, he was a threat. Considering he had well over 10 years to comply with these resolutions, he had more than ample time to do so, or manipulate things futher. If this one doesn't cook your cookie, then it's very obvious that you also pick and choose despite actual fact. [URL="http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/13456.htm"]http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/13456.htm[/URL] In your world, Saddam Hussein would still be in power, Millions of Iraqi Citizens would still be killed and tortured by their own ruthless dictator. There would be no freedom for the people of Iraq, and they certainly would not be able to elect their own leaders without fear. Iraq would continue to persue and obtain Chemical, Biological, and Nuclear Weapons, and in the hands of it's Dictator, Saddam Hussein; a delusional person bent on conquering other countries to expand his control (as proven in the Gulf War), and would eventually turn them on the United States, Great Brittain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and any other nation, as they see fit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
We are F*UCKED!!!!!!!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
