Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="supermaxx123" data-source="post: 7379855" data-attributes="member: 613324">I agree that rear fill is for someone who sits in the back. SQ is too broad a word. Most people have their subwoofer set +3db or more apart from say the front stage which I will admit is fun at times, but causes drowning out, that to me is not sq. SQ is when your speakers are all equally loud depending on what recording your playing. Recording has the biggest effect on bass, and that is why I feel epicenters are for people who like bass, because if a song doesn&#039;t get &quot;loud&quot; maybe it wasn&#039;t meant to.As far as rear fill, It&#039;s mostly up to the user, takes more power, speakers, wires etc, but does benefit the people sitting in the back. As far as someone sitting alone in the front with rear fill, seems like it would just take away from the imaging which most people do not care about or notice. There really is no right or wrong with rear fill, I personally ditch it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="supermaxx123, post: 7379855, member: 613324"] I agree that rear fill is for someone who sits in the back. SQ is too broad a word. Most people have their subwoofer set +3db or more apart from say the front stage which I will admit is fun at times, but causes drowning out, that to me is not sq. SQ is when your speakers are all equally loud depending on what recording your playing. Recording has the biggest effect on bass, and that is why I feel epicenters are for people who like bass, because if a song doesn't get "loud" maybe it wasn't meant to. As far as rear fill, It's mostly up to the user, takes more power, speakers, wires etc, but does benefit the people sitting in the back. As far as someone sitting alone in the front with rear fill, seems like it would just take away from the imaging which most people do not care about or notice. There really is no right or wrong with rear fill, I personally ditch it. [/QUOTE]

Verification