Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tbrik44" data-source="post: 376441" data-attributes="member: 552463"><p>I have the Eclipse 3122 I bougt on Ebay new for $90 plus shipping. I think they were going for $200-$250 new. I was using it to run my Polk EX12 in a sealed box bridged at 4ohm. Bridged its rated at 160 watts. My manual says 40x2 stereo, but an eclipse brochure I had rated it at 55x2. My sub sounded great, but I pulled it because Im selling the car and I want to keep the Eclipse. I put in a cheap Us Acoustics 50x2 or 160 bridged amp from Crutchfield I got for $49.95 with no x-over because my EQ has a sub X-over. The sub sounds pretty good, but I think the Eclipse sounds better, maybe due to the &amp;gt;200 damping factor it has. Im going to run some coaxs or maybe components in my next car with it. Anyway, I thinks its a very good amp and has a great crossover section with high-pass, low-pass and even a band-pass crossover so you can run some mid-bass speakers and pre-amp outputs with its own crossover.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Tbrik44, post: 376441, member: 552463"] I have the Eclipse 3122 I bougt on Ebay new for $90 plus shipping. I think they were going for $200-$250 new. I was using it to run my Polk EX12 in a sealed box bridged at 4ohm. Bridged its rated at 160 watts. My manual says 40x2 stereo, but an eclipse brochure I had rated it at 55x2. My sub sounded great, but I pulled it because Im selling the car and I want to keep the Eclipse. I put in a cheap Us Acoustics 50x2 or 160 bridged amp from Crutchfield I got for $49.95 with no x-over because my EQ has a sub X-over. The sub sounds pretty good, but I think the Eclipse sounds better, maybe due to the >200 damping factor it has. Im going to run some coaxs or maybe components in my next car with it. Anyway, I thinks its a very good amp and has a great crossover section with high-pass, low-pass and even a band-pass crossover so you can run some mid-bass speakers and pre-amp outputs with its own crossover. [/QUOTE]

Verification