Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Phatillusion" data-source="post: 53800" data-attributes="member: 541271"><p>I'm not sure why we didn't get him last time.   They didn't have the type of plan they did now, it wouldn't be as easy for the US to go in and take out the government and replace it with "their" own picks.  If Sadam had been taken out before, most likely the people of Iraq would have had a big say in who became their leader.  So back then, the US didn't have the advantage they have now.  Being they have already succeeded in taking out the Taliban, so now they move on to Iraq, and they have every reason to attack, because Sadam is a terrorist, always has been and always will be, but now they can take him out, and replace him with a leader the US chooses.   Don't get me wrong, we are doing most of this stuff for the good, but there is an alterior motive behind it.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Top