Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Unconstitutional
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Proximity" data-source="post: 7146817" data-attributes="member: 589997"><p>Says the guy who is arguing his new revolutionary concept for how the population should be represented. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif So basically you're saying that less than 1% of the population should have 35% representation in congress? Another 5% should have 33% representation, the next 15% should have 28% representation, 38% should have 25% representation, 32% should have 15% and 7% should have 10% representation.</p><p></p><p>Wait, how could everyone's total representation equal 150%? I'll be honest, I think you're "representation should be equal to taxes" concept is pretty f<span style="font-size: 10px">u</span>cking stupid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Proximity, post: 7146817, member: 589997"] Says the guy who is arguing his new revolutionary concept for how the population should be represented. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] So basically you're saying that less than 1% of the population should have 35% representation in congress? Another 5% should have 33% representation, the next 15% should have 28% representation, 38% should have 25% representation, 32% should have 15% and 7% should have 10% representation. Wait, how could everyone's total representation equal 150%? I'll be honest, I think you're "representation should be equal to taxes" concept is pretty f[SIZE=10px]u[/SIZE]cking stupid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Unconstitutional
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
