Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Unconstitutional
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="galacticmonkey" data-source="post: 7145826" data-attributes="member: 570857"><p>Capitalism is either an all or nothing idea. Its either a free market or it isnt. Free is an exreme term like always or never. Not like sometimes or usually. If a market is regulated at all, it isnt free. If there was a plantation owner who had a slave and told him "You can do as you like, and go as you like, but you are required to be in your house from 10pm to 8am every day", would that slave be free? No. He is mostly free, but he isnt free.</p><p></p><p>You are saying that government should regulate, redistribute, etc. When a coutry sets its economy around capitalism, but then starts fu<span style="color: black">c</span>king with it, you get America. Its shown that the more free (economically, politically, socially) a culture/economy is, the more prosperous it is. Socialism can work. The government just stimulates production. Its a zero-sum game. There is nothing to be gained. It can work in that aspect. But if there is a free market, each person does what is best for themself, and because of that, they make themselves rich. Look at Hong Kong. In the last 60 years it went from a small city to one of the most prosperous and economically acitive cities in the world. Why? Because while they are not a true free market, they are the closest thing this planet has right now, and for the past couple decades.</p><p></p><p>Look at this chart of economic freedom. Maybe its just me, but I see a coorelation between the quality of living/per capita GDP and rating given.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Index_of_Economic_Freedom_2009.png/800px-Index_of_Economic_Freedom_2009.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="galacticmonkey, post: 7145826, member: 570857"] Capitalism is either an all or nothing idea. Its either a free market or it isnt. Free is an exreme term like always or never. Not like sometimes or usually. If a market is regulated at all, it isnt free. If there was a plantation owner who had a slave and told him "You can do as you like, and go as you like, but you are required to be in your house from 10pm to 8am every day", would that slave be free? No. He is mostly free, but he isnt free. You are saying that government should regulate, redistribute, etc. When a coutry sets its economy around capitalism, but then starts fu[COLOR=black]c[/COLOR]king with it, you get America. Its shown that the more free (economically, politically, socially) a culture/economy is, the more prosperous it is. Socialism can work. The government just stimulates production. Its a zero-sum game. There is nothing to be gained. It can work in that aspect. But if there is a free market, each person does what is best for themself, and because of that, they make themselves rich. Look at Hong Kong. In the last 60 years it went from a small city to one of the most prosperous and economically acitive cities in the world. Why? Because while they are not a true free market, they are the closest thing this planet has right now, and for the past couple decades. Look at this chart of economic freedom. Maybe its just me, but I see a coorelation between the quality of living/per capita GDP and rating given. [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Index_of_Economic_Freedom_2009.png/800px-Index_of_Economic_Freedom_2009.png[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Unconstitutional
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list