Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7137066" data-attributes="member: 549629">Its funny how you say my point is obvious, and then continue on your tangent that shows you either cant follow my point, or refuse to do so. The only comparison I made between slavery and your 90% tax idea, was to conclude both have been advocated by our govt in the past. The fact that you mention, that slavery is so obviously unfair, is the exact reaction my comparison was suppose to reveal. I say 90% tax rates are unfair, you say our govt has done it in the past. I say our govt has advocated slavery in the past, and you say &#039;90% taxes and slavery arent the same thing&#039;. No shit, sherlock. Get a clue, I get tired of waiting for your brain to play catch-up in these discussions.Take that &#039;Democrats just care about less fortunate people&#039; bullshit somewhere that people might be stupid enough to believe it, not here. First off, YOU would stand to benefit from your 90% tax structure. So when YOU advocate that tax structure, YOU are the people you refer to as &#039;less fortunate&#039;. Secondly, Democrats like to pretend this is all about fairness, that poor poor average citizen who is &#039;less fortunate&#039; than the elite richest 1%. Those same Democrats, people like you, fail to remember you are TAKING money from people who EARNED IT to play your little &#039;lets be fair and share&#039; game. We&#039;ve been through this before, frankly Im surprised you still think that failed line of reasoning will work on me. Im sure it helps you keep a sense of personal fairness as you are demanding benefits from someone elses money, but your little ego saving excuse does not work on me.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7137066, member: 549629"] Its funny how you say my point is obvious, and then continue on your tangent that shows you either cant follow my point, or refuse to do so. The only comparison I made between slavery and your 90% tax idea, was to conclude both have been advocated by our govt in the past. The fact that you mention, that slavery is so obviously unfair, is the exact reaction my comparison was suppose to reveal. I say 90% tax rates are unfair, you say our govt has done it in the past. I say our govt has advocated slavery in the past, and you say '90% taxes and slavery arent the same thing'. No [COLOR=black]s[/COLOR]hit, sherlock. Get a clue, I get tired of waiting for your brain to play catch-up in these discussions. Take that 'Democrats just care about less fortunate people' bullshit somewhere that people might be stupid enough to believe it, not here. First off, YOU would stand to benefit from your 90% tax structure. So when YOU advocate that tax structure, YOU are the people you refer to as 'less fortunate'. Secondly, Democrats like to pretend this is all about fairness, that poor poor average citizen who is 'less fortunate' than the elite richest 1%. Those same Democrats, people like you, fail to remember you are TAKING money from people who EARNED IT to play your little 'lets be fair and share' game. We've been through this before, frankly Im surprised you still think that failed line of reasoning will work on me. Im sure it helps you keep a sense of personal fairness as you are demanding benefits from someone elses money, but your little ego saving excuse does not work on me. [/QUOTE]

Verification