Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
type r vs shiva vs elemental k
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kaosmoon" data-source="post: 62805" data-attributes="member: 543287"><p>I personally feel it would be more than competitive with a he2. The K is designed first and foremost for sq applications (if a speaker this affordable doesn't sound good, what's the piont?). However, the way it was built allows it to do many things very well. The extremely versatile design allows it to sound great due to the middle of the road q in sealed or ported applications. The amount of throw it has allows it to get stankily loud in sealed or ported applications. The low end on the lil sucker is just something imo. The sq side of the K series is more than capable, it just has a 'hidden agenda' if you want to call it that meaning it sure as heck likes the spl side of the game as well. Port and tune it high the peak just grows and grows allowing it to be extremely usable in that application as well. It's one of the sq subs that wasn't happen with the traditional sq label that got desigend to do a few other things as well.</p><p></p><p>Ben</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kaosmoon, post: 62805, member: 543287"] I personally feel it would be more than competitive with a he2. The K is designed first and foremost for sq applications (if a speaker this affordable doesn't sound good, what's the piont?). However, the way it was built allows it to do many things very well. The extremely versatile design allows it to sound great due to the middle of the road q in sealed or ported applications. The amount of throw it has allows it to get stankily loud in sealed or ported applications. The low end on the lil sucker is just something imo. The sq side of the K series is more than capable, it just has a 'hidden agenda' if you want to call it that meaning it sure as heck likes the spl side of the game as well. Port and tune it high the peak just grows and grows allowing it to be extremely usable in that application as well. It's one of the sq subs that wasn't happen with the traditional sq label that got desigend to do a few other things as well. Ben [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
type r vs shiva vs elemental k
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list