Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Tubes.....and the Jerks that use them.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thylantyr" data-source="post: 2304675" data-attributes="member: 560358"><p>It's also nice to learn the truth about audio in spite that you may have</p><p></p><p>personal preferences. I have preferences - just because - , but I know</p><p></p><p>the audible effects, if any for each case. It's nice to educate yourself to know</p><p></p><p>the issues.</p><p></p><p>I've done D/A to ADC tests where I sabotaged the signal path by</p><p></p><p>doing extra extra converstions vs. digital pathway up to the audio amp.</p><p></p><p>Result: nobody can tell the difference. Not only is the signal path much longer,</p><p></p><p>the signal is being 'hacked' to bits {pun} many times over. lol</p><p></p><p>This is funny because many people in the audio world insist they need</p><p></p><p>external 'special' DAC's, they insist that only 1 conversion is done, but</p><p></p><p>I know these people would fail a blind test because nobody has ears</p><p></p><p>as good as test equipment.</p><p></p><p>An interesting blind test would be MP3 vs. uncompressed audio.</p><p></p><p>At what bit rate do people start to hear a difference? They will fail at</p><p></p><p>some compression rate. If compressed music is not audible, then why</p><p></p><p>would a pure signal taking a long path be audible ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thylantyr, post: 2304675, member: 560358"] It's also nice to learn the truth about audio in spite that you may have personal preferences. I have preferences - just because - , but I know the audible effects, if any for each case. It's nice to educate yourself to know the issues. I've done D/A to ADC tests where I sabotaged the signal path by doing extra extra converstions vs. digital pathway up to the audio amp. Result: nobody can tell the difference. Not only is the signal path much longer, the signal is being 'hacked' to bits {pun} many times over. lol This is funny because many people in the audio world insist they need external 'special' DAC's, they insist that only 1 conversion is done, but I know these people would fail a blind test because nobody has ears as good as test equipment. An interesting blind test would be MP3 vs. uncompressed audio. At what bit rate do people start to hear a difference? They will fail at some compression rate. If compressed music is not audible, then why would a pure signal taking a long path be audible ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Tubes.....and the Jerks that use them.
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list