Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Trying to gain comparison knowledge on subs...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 600612" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Most of the SQL drivers you guys are talking about, the W7, XXX and Brahma, are BL optimized drivers. Read up on XBL^2 and JL's method of BL optimizing the dub, you'll find the design was intended purely for SQ purposes, and long excursion capabilities were merely a bonus side effect of the overall design. Ive seen representatives from the manufacturers of all three of these subs say that. Even looking back to the old days of one of the first long excursion drivers, the GZ Nuke, its design intent was SQ. I think if you want to nitpick further than that, you are just being arguementative. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p><p></p><p></p><p>Keep in mind, those SPL setups run right at, or very close to tuning for their ported enclosures. At tuning in a ported enclosure, cone excursion is at its minimum. In this type of extreme setup (the world of SPL burping), other specs become more important than excursion, such as power handling, cooling capabilities, etc. This does not mean excursion is meaningless in the rest of the world, where we play music through our subs that diverges from the tuning freq.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 600612, member: 549629"] Most of the SQL drivers you guys are talking about, the W7, XXX and Brahma, are BL optimized drivers. Read up on XBL^2 and JL's method of BL optimizing the dub, you'll find the design was intended purely for SQ purposes, and long excursion capabilities were merely a bonus side effect of the overall design. Ive seen representatives from the manufacturers of all three of these subs say that. Even looking back to the old days of one of the first long excursion drivers, the GZ Nuke, its design intent was SQ. I think if you want to nitpick further than that, you are just being arguementative. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] Keep in mind, those SPL setups run right at, or very close to tuning for their ported enclosures. At tuning in a ported enclosure, cone excursion is at its minimum. In this type of extreme setup (the world of SPL burping), other specs become more important than excursion, such as power handling, cooling capabilities, etc. This does not mean excursion is meaningless in the rest of the world, where we play music through our subs that diverges from the tuning freq. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Trying to gain comparison knowledge on subs...
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list