Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
torn spiders?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 2791178" data-attributes="member: 573988"><p>no actually i believe you are right and normally it does improve upper-base to have a smaller enclosure but it didn't for me... that was the reason i changed the design... now i am definity not shure about this but i do have a theory why...</p><p></p><p>so keep in mind i am saying i DO NOT know this i am specualating...</p><p></p><p>take one sub... in a small enclosure there is more pressure on the cone makeing the cone have a easy time going at a high frequecy because the pressure makes the sub want to go back to the "0" excursion point faster... at lower frequecy you want it to return slower so less pressure on the cone is needed for better responce... so with one sub the only factor is the pressure inside the box...</p><p></p><p>now add a sub... this adds to the pressure inside yes you double the airspace but it still has more force on each cone... because now pressure is resisting the cones instead of only resisting the enclosure.... now with 4 of them that pressure is even greater... does that make sence? if not i'm clueless as to why... but i know the low lows **** for those 10's i don't have to be a genius in car audio to know it either</p><p></p><p>kinda like the effect of a passive radiator on the airspace</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 2791178, member: 573988"] no actually i believe you are right and normally it does improve upper-base to have a smaller enclosure but it didn't for me... that was the reason i changed the design... now i am definity not shure about this but i do have a theory why... so keep in mind i am saying i DO NOT know this i am specualating... take one sub... in a small enclosure there is more pressure on the cone makeing the cone have a easy time going at a high frequecy because the pressure makes the sub want to go back to the "0" excursion point faster... at lower frequecy you want it to return slower so less pressure on the cone is needed for better responce... so with one sub the only factor is the pressure inside the box... now add a sub... this adds to the pressure inside yes you double the airspace but it still has more force on each cone... because now pressure is resisting the cones instead of only resisting the enclosure.... now with 4 of them that pressure is even greater... does that make sence? if not i'm clueless as to why... but i know the low lows **** for those 10's i don't have to be a genius in car audio to know it either kinda like the effect of a passive radiator on the airspace [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
torn spiders?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list