Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
This is what I'm doing tonight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MisterDeadeye" data-source="post: 7403072" data-attributes="member: 611015"><p>Well, I wasn't trying to go to into psychological studies. I understand what you're saying though. The thing I'm trying to get across is that using an external force(ie., drug) to alter the chemical levels in your brain by itself isn't indicative of, and doesn't always ensure depression or whatever else may happen. I know things are not as simple as saying, "It's not possible to be depressed from using drugs." That's not what I'm even trying to say. It's certainly possible for people to become psychologically dependent on drugs, but they can also become psychologically dependent on almost everything, including food, puking, licking chalk, chewing thumbnails, etc. That's why I wasn't trying to make the discussion psychological, which is why I didn't want to talk about addiction.</p><p></p><p>I was trying to show that drugs aren't always bad, which you said in your first post.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The subjective to each person thing I understand completely, and completely agree. I'm sure I've got problems, and haven't had the guts to ever go to a therapist/psychiatrist, whatever, to find out. Chemical imbalances are very serious issues, but you need to realize that some people(there are a lot of us, and some/most are products of academia with different degrees, devoting their lives to finding out exactly what happens when you take a drug, and exactly how it effects your mind in relation to brain chemistry, etc.) take drugs for reasons other than filling some void, or numbing themselves, or hiding problems, etc.</p><p></p><p>And I know you weren't saying that everyone takes drugs for bad reasons, but you WERE saying that all drugs are bad, or harmful to your body, which simply isn't true. I'm not arguing that necessarily every drug is good, or that they help your body(some, however, have speculated that, and done research that coincides with the idea that certain illegal drugs do have a helpful effect to certain cells -- weed, for example). Of course, these tests are subjective as well. Studies have found that neurons are killed by THC in children(don't remember if they tested on actual children--not likely--or rates), but that they protected neurons in adults(again, probably rats).</p><p></p><p>I don't think the possible side effects(psychological dependency, maybe others that I haven't found to be a large enough problem to remember) are really hidden from the public or the average drug user anymore. People have the internet readily available, and most intelligent people with rational minds can research and find out what can happen, why it can happen, and finally prevent it from happening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MisterDeadeye, post: 7403072, member: 611015"] Well, I wasn't trying to go to into psychological studies. I understand what you're saying though. The thing I'm trying to get across is that using an external force(ie., drug) to alter the chemical levels in your brain by itself isn't indicative of, and doesn't always ensure depression or whatever else may happen. I know things are not as simple as saying, "It's not possible to be depressed from using drugs." That's not what I'm even trying to say. It's certainly possible for people to become psychologically dependent on drugs, but they can also become psychologically dependent on almost everything, including food, puking, licking chalk, chewing thumbnails, etc. That's why I wasn't trying to make the discussion psychological, which is why I didn't want to talk about addiction. I was trying to show that drugs aren't always bad, which you said in your first post. The subjective to each person thing I understand completely, and completely agree. I'm sure I've got problems, and haven't had the guts to ever go to a therapist/psychiatrist, whatever, to find out. Chemical imbalances are very serious issues, but you need to realize that some people(there are a lot of us, and some/most are products of academia with different degrees, devoting their lives to finding out exactly what happens when you take a drug, and exactly how it effects your mind in relation to brain chemistry, etc.) take drugs for reasons other than filling some void, or numbing themselves, or hiding problems, etc. And I know you weren't saying that everyone takes drugs for bad reasons, but you WERE saying that all drugs are bad, or harmful to your body, which simply isn't true. I'm not arguing that necessarily every drug is good, or that they help your body(some, however, have speculated that, and done research that coincides with the idea that certain illegal drugs do have a helpful effect to certain cells -- weed, for example). Of course, these tests are subjective as well. Studies have found that neurons are killed by THC in children(don't remember if they tested on actual children--not likely--or rates), but that they protected neurons in adults(again, probably rats). I don't think the possible side effects(psychological dependency, maybe others that I haven't found to be a large enough problem to remember) are really hidden from the public or the average drug user anymore. People have the internet readily available, and most intelligent people with rational minds can research and find out what can happen, why it can happen, and finally prevent it from happening. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
This is what I'm doing tonight
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list