Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThxOne" data-source="post: 8652000" data-attributes="member: 675210">I said I agree there should be weapons free zones, not remove weapons from people. I will give schools as an example. Armed security and metal detectors at schools, all schools. That would bring school shootings way down just by doing that. The people saying &quot;ban guns&quot; because some kid shot up some other kids is just speaking emotionally and not thinking rationally. That child was going to get a gun no matter what. Disarm the military... then we would never go to war. See what I mean? It&#039;s silly.&quot;The people who want the constitution ‘too evolve’ are the ones who want to remove the rights of the people. &quot; Really? This is really how you think? Evolve - : to change or develop slowly often into a better, more complex, or more advanced state :. Remove -: to cause (something) to no longer exist:. These are NOT the same words and do NOT mean the same things. This is either how you think or you telling others what they think.A person breaks into a house. This person shoots someone with his/her legally obtained and constitutionally protected handgun that this person has the right to own. This person is caught, pays a penalty of some kind and then legally buys another handgun. The Bill of Rights says:&quot;Amendment IIA well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.&quot;Do you think this person should still have the right to own a firearm?Do you think that every person has the mental capacity to own a firearm?Do you think that the Second Amendment is absolute and should be the final word no matter what?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThxOne, post: 8652000, member: 675210"] I said I agree there should be weapons free zones, not remove weapons from people. I will give schools as an example. Armed security and metal detectors at schools, all schools. That would bring school shootings way down just by doing that. The people saying "ban guns" because some kid shot up some other kids is just speaking emotionally and not thinking rationally. That child was going to get a gun no matter what. Disarm the military... then we would never go to war. See what I mean? It's silly. "The people who want the constitution ‘too evolve’ are the ones who want to remove the rights of the people. " Really? This is really how you think? [B]Evolve[/B] - : to change or develop slowly often into a better, more complex, or more advanced state :. [B]Remove[/B] -: to cause (something) to no longer exist:. These are NOT the same words and do NOT mean the same things. This is either how you think or you telling others what they think. A person breaks into a house. This person shoots someone with his/her legally obtained and constitutionally protected handgun that this person has the right to own. This person is caught, pays a penalty of some kind and then legally buys another handgun. The Bill of Rights says: "Amendment II A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, [B]shall not be infringed[/B]." Do you think this person should still have the right to own a firearm? Do you think that every person has the mental capacity to own a firearm? Do you think that the Second Amendment is absolute and should be the final word no matter what? [/QUOTE]

Verification