Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
THE Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joshpoints" data-source="post: 177966" data-attributes="member: 546465"><p>That would be fun except I don't live close to detroit. Those dyno numbers are pretty good out of a mustang. Is that rear wheel horse power or at the crank? My brothers is making between 275-280 rear wheel hp, but it might be higher due to clutch slippage. His clutch has over 70,000 miles on it and his friend kind of burnt the clutch up a little bit driving it around one day. One thing that's funny between mustangs and camaros, camaros have a strong transmission and mustangs have a weak transmission. Camaros have a weak rearend and mustangs have a strong rearend. Too bad mustangs didn't use a camaro transmission and camaros did use a have a mustang rearend. You don't run into the weak points in these cars until you do some large power increases. I must say though, if ford makes the 2005 look like its prototype that car is going to be tight. Hopefully it will have around 400 hp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joshpoints, post: 177966, member: 546465"] That would be fun except I don't live close to detroit. Those dyno numbers are pretty good out of a mustang. Is that rear wheel horse power or at the crank? My brothers is making between 275-280 rear wheel hp, but it might be higher due to clutch slippage. His clutch has over 70,000 miles on it and his friend kind of burnt the clutch up a little bit driving it around one day. One thing that's funny between mustangs and camaros, camaros have a strong transmission and mustangs have a weak transmission. Camaros have a weak rearend and mustangs have a strong rearend. Too bad mustangs didn't use a camaro transmission and camaros did use a have a mustang rearend. You don't run into the weak points in these cars until you do some large power increases. I must say though, if ford makes the 2005 look like its prototype that car is going to be tight. Hopefully it will have around 400 hp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
THE Thread
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list