Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 1101885" data-attributes="member: 549629">That&#039;s funny, my comments on giving the XXX more power were in reference to comparing their SPL output. One was being fed 100% of its rated power while the other was being fed 50%... at the beginning of the test at least. So yeah, what was I thinking mentioning that when you guys were trying to compare which got louder? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif And I never once made any comment even remotely like a XXX would sound &quot;10X better&quot; than an Rl-p. Nice try.Face it squeak, you are now doing what you accused me of then, defending your precious favorite sub against the new forum boner without having done the comparison test yourself. Frankly, Im not even disagree&#039;ing with your comments here or your opinions, Im only disagree&#039;ing with your not allowing someone else the same without slandering them or their motives. I think Ive made my point now, you can chose to see it, ignore it, or reply with some lame excuse why you are right now but I was wrong then. Either way, I wash my hands of this with you. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gifmrray, oh now I remember us talking about this. Their website does show two different enclosure reccomendations in two different place, or at least it use to. The 2.5 is the incorrect one. But yeah, the SQ/SQL recommendation is smaller, at 2cuft per 12. That&#039;s what they recommend by mouth over the phone as well (or use to heh). My bad on not remembering you;d told me that before, but again, 2.5 is too big really.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 1101885, member: 549629"] That's funny, my comments on giving the XXX more power were in reference to comparing their SPL output. One was being fed 100% of its rated power while the other was being fed 50%... at the beginning of the test at least. So yeah, what was I thinking mentioning that when you guys were trying to compare which got louder? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] And I never once made any comment even remotely like a XXX would sound "10X better" than an Rl-p. Nice try. Face it squeak, you are now doing what you accused me of then, defending your precious favorite sub against the new forum boner without having done the comparison test yourself. Frankly, Im not even disagree'ing with your comments here or your opinions, Im only disagree'ing with your not allowing someone else the same without slandering them or their motives. I think Ive made my point now, you can chose to see it, ignore it, or reply with some lame excuse why you are right now but I was wrong then. Either way, I wash my hands of this with you. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif[/IMG] mrray, oh now I remember us talking about this. Their website does show two different enclosure reccomendations in two different place, or at least it use to. The 2.5 is the incorrect one. But yeah, the SQ/SQL recommendation is smaller, at 2cuft per 12. That's what they recommend by mouth over the phone as well (or use to heh). My bad on not remembering you;d told me that before, but again, 2.5 is too big really. [/QUOTE]

Verification