Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
The Official Type R Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spkrman" data-source="post: 1101831" data-attributes="member: 548682"><p>I'll some it up so far in... not done yet //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p></p><p>The RL-P will be given its fair shot @ performing to its max. The test probably won't be "finished" until monday.</p><p></p><p>Something we can all agree on, the RL-P sounds bad in this box. Its on par with previous tests, yet I'm still "biased"? hmm... That that for what its worth and move on. I'm not one to *only* test the box in the "rec'd" boxes, I'll test it in anything and everything , as stated in the email above to mike.</p><p></p><p>I look forward to hearing the RL-P in the 2 cube 28hz box, contrary to popular belief I *want* the woof to perform well. I didn't get into the test with the idea of screwing over SS and the RL-P, its just an objective comparison.</p><p></p><p>I have a 1 cube sealed box floating around somewhere... probably in my giant stack of test boxes. I also have a 1.5 ported (aerports, tuning = what I want) box floating around... it may get a shot if the 2 cube doesn't do the RL-P justice.</p><p></p><p>Before you write this test off as BS...</p><p></p><p>not done yet //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spkrman, post: 1101831, member: 548682"] I'll some it up so far in... not done yet [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] The RL-P will be given its fair shot @ performing to its max. The test probably won't be "finished" until monday. Something we can all agree on, the RL-P sounds bad in this box. Its on par with previous tests, yet I'm still "biased"? hmm... That that for what its worth and move on. I'm not one to *only* test the box in the "rec'd" boxes, I'll test it in anything and everything , as stated in the email above to mike. I look forward to hearing the RL-P in the 2 cube 28hz box, contrary to popular belief I *want* the woof to perform well. I didn't get into the test with the idea of screwing over SS and the RL-P, its just an objective comparison. I have a 1 cube sealed box floating around somewhere... probably in my giant stack of test boxes. I also have a 1.5 ported (aerports, tuning = what I want) box floating around... it may get a shot if the 2 cube doesn't do the RL-P justice. Before you write this test off as BS... not done yet [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
The Official Type R Thread
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list