Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 1101571" data-attributes="member: 555320">There&#039;s nothing to &quot;shhh&quot; about.&nbsp; I own an Rl-p, and am well justified in saying that an Rl-p does not sound anywhere even close to as described in the &quot;comparison&quot;.&nbsp; SPL #&#039;s?&nbsp; Well, I really could care less since farted SPL #&#039;s don&#039;t impress me any and are not a concern of mine, other than saying one test in one box in one vehicle proves absolutely nothing really.&nbsp; Two tests in two boxes in one vehicle proves nothing.&nbsp; Hell...three tests with 3 boxes doesn&#039;t really prove a whole hell of a lot.And my main problem with all of these &quot;Type-R&quot; comparisons is that people read this one test, in one vehicle with limited number of box alignments (at best) and try to come to conclusive judgments such as &quot;Oh...Type-R pwns them all!!&quot; as evidenced in this thread alone.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 1101571, member: 555320"] There's nothing to "shhh" about. I own an Rl-p, and am well justified in saying that an Rl-p does not sound [I]anywhere[/I] even close to as described in the "comparison". SPL #'s? Well, I really could care less since farted SPL #'s don't impress me any and are not a concern of mine, other than saying one test in one box in one vehicle proves absolutely nothing really. Two tests in two boxes in one vehicle proves nothing. Hell...three tests with 3 boxes doesn't really prove a whole hell of a lot. And my main problem with [I]all[/I] of these "Type-R" comparisons is that people read this one test, in one vehicle with limited number of box alignments (at best) and try to come to conclusive judgments such as "Oh...Type-R pwns them all!!" as evidenced in this thread alone. [/QUOTE]

Verification