Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 1050827" data-attributes="member: 549629">Its people like Bluntman420 who turn an otherwise meaningful and mature debate into a mud slinging contest, all the while trying to attain the illusion of being the mature one. Great job!You are reaching mechanical limits on these subs burping near tuning for SPL output? Wow. If that&#039;s true, then yes I understand your point, and the explanation is appreciated. The attitude however isn&#039;t. Oh well.Hundreth, I understand what you are saying, and to a point agree. But what you are missing (and a few of the a-holes like bluntman) is I haven&#039;t been here to try to disprove anyone, but to learn. If this test had showed what I and many others had come to think of from Davids tests were incorrect results, I wanted to know. Conversely, if these tests were implying something incorrectly, I wanted to know too. That is what these forums are for. Some of you guys seem to think they are just for people to post up information with no room for questioning. Some popel get get defensive, start throwing around terms like band wangon etc, when in the end I just wanted to know the truth, the big picture, not necsaarily what just David&#039;s test showed, or this test. Ive stated all along I wasn&#039;t questioning the test, or &#039;my precious RE subs&#039; against another brand, simply trying to understand why there seemed to be opposing results flying around. Perhaps if what spkrman said is true and they are pushing the subs to mechanical limits near tuning in a vented box (quite a feat), then I have learned something here.&nbsp; //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif I learned where we were not habving a meeting of the minds. I do however agree its too bad its taken so many pages to come to this point, and had a few a-holes try to turn it into a flamefest along the way, but that comes with the territory around here. Thanks for the helpful comments.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 1050827, member: 549629"] Its people like Bluntman420 who turn an otherwise meaningful and mature debate into a mud slinging contest, all the while trying to attain the illusion of being the mature one. Great job! You are reaching mechanical limits on these subs burping near tuning for SPL output? Wow. If that's true, then yes I understand your point, and the explanation is appreciated. The attitude however isn't. Oh well. Hundreth, I understand what you are saying, and to a point agree. But what you are missing (and a few of the a-holes like bluntman) is I haven't been here to try to disprove anyone, but to learn. If this test had showed what I and many others had come to think of from Davids tests were incorrect results, I wanted to know. Conversely, if these tests were implying something incorrectly, I wanted to know too. That is what these forums are for. Some of you guys seem to think they are just for people to post up information with no room for questioning. Some popel get get defensive, start throwing around terms like band wangon etc, when in the end I just wanted to know the truth, the big picture, not necsaarily what just David's test showed, or this test. Ive stated all along I wasn't questioning the test, or 'my precious RE subs' against another brand, simply trying to understand why there seemed to be opposing results flying around. Perhaps if what spkrman said is true and they are pushing the subs to mechanical limits near tuning in a vented box (quite a feat), then I have learned something here. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] I learned where we were not habving a meeting of the minds. I do however agree its too bad its taken so many pages to come to this point, and had a few a-holes try to turn it into a flamefest along the way, but that comes with the territory around here. Thanks for the helpful comments. [/QUOTE]

Verification