Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Spkrman" data-source="post: 1050783" data-attributes="member: 548682">I don&#039;t know the precise architecture of both woofers and I doubt there is much info at all on the sexxx... but when you change one thing, you change many others.&quot;roughly 1800w per driver&quot; from dave&#039;s post... there was more power on tap here.Who&#039;s to say the SX handles more power?&nbsp;&nbsp; You run into alot of mechanical power handling drop going from a larger cone to a smaller one with the (assumed) same motor.&nbsp; IF the sexxx 15 handled more power, we wouldnt know it in that test, the limits weren&#039;t pushed.In the 10&quot; test... the limits are pushed and then some.&nbsp; The SX CRAPS OUT on the power, simple enough.One more time... effeciancy has poop to do with this test, the limiter here has been mechanical power handling the whole time.... hard to get a 10 to handle this much power at such a low note.2 completely unrelated tests... 2 completely different results.... wow, what a concept!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Spkrman, post: 1050783, member: 548682"] I don't know the precise architecture of both woofers and I doubt there is much info at all on the sexxx... but when you change one thing, you change many others. "roughly 1800w per driver" from dave's post... there was more power on tap here. Who's to say the SX handles more power? You run into alot of mechanical power handling drop going from a larger cone to a smaller one with the (assumed) same motor. IF the sexxx 15 handled more power, we wouldnt know it in that test, the limits weren't pushed. In the 10" test... the limits are pushed and then some. The SX CRAPS OUT on the power, simple enough. One more time... effeciancy has poop to do with this test, the limiter here has been mechanical power handling the whole time.... hard to get a 10 to handle this much power at such a low note. 2 completely unrelated tests... 2 completely different results.... wow, what a concept! [/QUOTE]

Verification