Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 1050740" data-attributes="member: 549629">Im not getting through to you. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif You seem to keep trying to compare a 10 to a 15. My question is, if David&#039;s test showed the SX was more efficient (at least in his install), why do you suggest the turn around in this test (and a drastic turn around) is simply due to changing from 15&#039;s to 10&#039;s. Your response thus far has been because of &#039;half the cone area&#039;... uhm okay? Unless YOU are comparing unlike sizes, I do not know why you keep coming back to &#039;half the cone&#039;, Im talking like-size subs here. I know the difference in cone are and how it affects output, it doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist or an SPL pro to understand it. But that does not explain why you suggest the SX 15 would be more efficient than the SeXXX 15, but the 10&#039;s would yield a drastically opposite result. This is what Im not getting.ngsm, I&#039;ll ignore your comments, because as usual they do nothing but try to fuel the flames. It was a pretty lousy flame tho, put a little more effort into it next time. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 1050740, member: 549629"] Im not getting through to you. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] You seem to keep trying to compare a 10 to a 15. My question is, if David's test showed the SX was more efficient (at least in his install), why do you suggest the turn around in this test (and a drastic turn around) is simply due to changing from 15's to 10's. Your response thus far has been because of 'half the cone area'... uhm okay? Unless YOU are comparing unlike sizes, I do not know why you keep coming back to 'half the cone', Im talking like-size subs here. I know the difference in cone are and how it affects output, it doesn't take a rocket scientist or an SPL pro to understand it. But that does not explain why you suggest the SX 15 would be more efficient than the SeXXX 15, but the 10's would yield a drastically opposite result. This is what Im not getting. ngsm, I'll ignore your comments, because as usual they do nothing but try to fuel the flames. It was a pretty lousy flame tho, put a little more effort into it next time. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification