Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 1049573" data-attributes="member: 549629">Now Im on the RE bandwagon? I see. When did I state RE was the end-all be-all of anything? When did I even compare the RE trst results to the R? I didn&#039;t. The people who need to &#039;get over it&#039; are the people who immediately jump to the &quot;its an RE bandwagon thing&quot; in defense of... nothing.Sure Ive considered RE&#039;s tests could have been flawed. Its always possible. But, is it likely? You&#039;re right, Im sure you tested much more extensively than RE did on their own products, before deciding to obsolete one of the subs because it didn&#039;t get as loud. I know you know alot spkrman, but Im not about to assume you know more and test better than RE does on their own subs, sorry.edit: and Ive never seen RE recommend an SX over an MT to any serious competitor. Only to people wanting a smaller enclosure, less power, etc etc. Again, their test showed the MT as being their most efficient driver in their line up. But what the MT has to do with this discussion I do not know. *shrug*</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 1049573, member: 549629"] Now Im on the RE bandwagon? I see. When did I state RE was the end-all be-all of anything? When did I even compare the RE trst results to the R? I didn't. The people who need to 'get over it' are the people who immediately jump to the "its an RE bandwagon thing" in defense of... nothing. Sure Ive considered RE's tests could have been flawed. Its always possible. But, is it likely? You're right, Im sure you tested much more extensively than RE did on their own products, before deciding to obsolete one of the subs because it didn't get as loud. I know you know alot spkrman, but Im not about to assume you know more and test better than RE does on their own subs, sorry. edit: and Ive never seen RE recommend an SX over an MT to any serious competitor. Only to people wanting a smaller enclosure, less power, etc etc. Again, their test showed the MT as being their most efficient driver in their line up. But what the MT has to do with this discussion I do not know. *shrug* [/QUOTE]

Verification