Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 1049546" data-attributes="member: 549629">If you are starting some attitude with me other this, don&#039;t bother. I&#039;ve already stated what I think is &#039;amiss&#039;. This test shows the SeXXX much louder than the SX, when according to RE&#039;s test the results should have been just the opposite. I do not know how to be more clear in this regard. Im not bashing tommy, this test or your new favorite sub (not even talking about the R), Im simply stating what should be stated: this test has a discrepancy over RE&#039;s test of the two same subs. RE claims their test shows the efficiency differences between the subs in their lineup, yet here we have two of the subs tested in same install and getting completely different results. That&#039;s not worth mentioning? hmm I guess we just not worry about that, just point out how the R &#039;pwnt&#039; and move on!Im not sure what you are implying here.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 1049546, member: 549629"] If you are starting some attitude with me other this, don't bother. I've already stated what I think is 'amiss'. This test shows the SeXXX much louder than the SX, when according to RE's test the results should have been just the opposite. I do not know how to be more clear in this regard. Im not bashing tommy, this test or your new favorite sub (not even talking about the R), Im simply stating what should be stated: this test has a discrepancy over RE's test of the two same subs. RE claims their test shows the efficiency differences between the subs in their lineup, yet here we have two of the subs tested in same install and getting completely different results. That's not worth mentioning? hmm I guess we just not worry about that, just point out how the R 'pwnt' and move on! Im not sure what you are implying here. [/QUOTE]

Verification