Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
**The MLB Thread**
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slammed" data-source="post: 3754261" data-attributes="member: 554316"><p>Mets Prefer Bedard Over Santana?</p><p></p><p>Interesting line from Lisa Kennelly of the Newark Star-Ledger today:</p><p></p><p>The Mets, however, prefer Baltimore's Erik Bedard over Santana, since he wouldn't require the same lucrative extension as part of the deal.</p><p></p><p>The Mets have an option the Red Sox and Yankees probably don't - they might be able to acquire Erik Bedard for a price similar to what it would take to get Johan Santana. It makes complete sense that Bedard would be more attractive - it's two years of him versus one of Santana. Even if Santana is a slightly better/more durable pitcher, two years easily outweighs that. Jon Heyman said on December 3rd that the Mets had offered Carlos Gomez, Phil Humber, and Aaron Heilman for Bedard, which "barely drew a response from Baltimore."</p><p></p><p>The Mets' interest in Bedard goes back for at least a few months; it's probably just been on the backburner. The Red Sox and Yankees have expressed interest, but it was said that Peter Angelos didn't want to trade Bedard within the division.</p><p></p><p>WTF??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p><p></p><p>ughZ!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slammed, post: 3754261, member: 554316"] Mets Prefer Bedard Over Santana? Interesting line from Lisa Kennelly of the Newark Star-Ledger today: The Mets, however, prefer Baltimore's Erik Bedard over Santana, since he wouldn't require the same lucrative extension as part of the deal. The Mets have an option the Red Sox and Yankees probably don't - they might be able to acquire Erik Bedard for a price similar to what it would take to get Johan Santana. It makes complete sense that Bedard would be more attractive - it's two years of him versus one of Santana. Even if Santana is a slightly better/more durable pitcher, two years easily outweighs that. Jon Heyman said on December 3rd that the Mets had offered Carlos Gomez, Phil Humber, and Aaron Heilman for Bedard, which "barely drew a response from Baltimore." The Mets' interest in Bedard goes back for at least a few months; it's probably just been on the backburner. The Red Sox and Yankees have expressed interest, but it was said that Peter Angelos didn't want to trade Bedard within the division. WTF??!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ughZ! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
**The MLB Thread**
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list