Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
**The MLB Thread**
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iceteebone" data-source="post: 3463685" data-attributes="member: 549344"><p>Your post doesn't make sense. Buster Olney said in his blog Detroit was a contender and I posted the link in this thread //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=olney_buster&amp;id=3084735" target="_blank">http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=olney_buster&amp;id=3084735</a></p><p></p><p>Jayson Stark was just on Mike &amp; Mike this morning and said Detroit and the Mets were front runners. I don't know what you are saying about the payroll. Your sentences are too incoherent. The Tigers payroll at the begining of 2006 was 80 million. In 2003 it was near 50 million. By the begining of this season it will be around 105 million. Do you see a trend here? In 2004 they signed Pudge to a big deal. In 2005 they signed Magglio to a big deal. In 2006 they signed Kenny Rogers. In 2007 they took on Sheffield. Now they take on Renteria. Do you see something here? Each year they have taken on more and more salary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iceteebone, post: 3463685, member: 549344"] Your post doesn't make sense. Buster Olney said in his blog Detroit was a contender and I posted the link in this thread [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif[/IMG][URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=olney_buster&id=3084735"]http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=olney_buster&id=3084735[/URL] Jayson Stark was just on Mike & Mike this morning and said Detroit and the Mets were front runners. I don't know what you are saying about the payroll. Your sentences are too incoherent. The Tigers payroll at the begining of 2006 was 80 million. In 2003 it was near 50 million. By the begining of this season it will be around 105 million. Do you see a trend here? In 2004 they signed Pudge to a big deal. In 2005 they signed Magglio to a big deal. In 2006 they signed Kenny Rogers. In 2007 they took on Sheffield. Now they take on Renteria. Do you see something here? Each year they have taken on more and more salary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
**The MLB Thread**
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list