Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rochambeau" data-source="post: 2545882" data-attributes="member: 570071">LMAO, a right winger?&nbsp; Hardly....&nbsp; Much more of a McCain moderate.&nbsp; Pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, pro-seperation of church/state...&nbsp; Believe in honor and integrity, neither of which Clinton had.&nbsp; As for Bush, I never cared much for him at all.&nbsp; Thought his tactics were dirty in his first campaign and that he is basically too dumb and underqualified to be prez.&nbsp; I was with him on the tax cuts to revive the economy (which worked) but his deficit spending, cowboy foreign policy and cramming the Christian right social agenda down our mf&#039;in throats basically have me counting the days &#039;till he is out of office.Politics aside....&nbsp; First, you don&#039;t even know what hearsay means &quot;and are making yourself look like a fool&quot;.&nbsp; I keep saying there is evidence v. McGwire, but you choose to ignore that.&nbsp; There is eyewitness testimony (Jose Canseco), physical evidence (his ridiculous growth and unusual performance late in his career) and a defacto admission of guilt (congressional testimony and admitted Andro use).&nbsp; Strong enough for conviction in a court of law?&nbsp; No, but strong enough to sway my opinion when you add it all up.Hypocrisy would be if there were similar evidence against Gwynn and Ripken and I chose to ignore it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rochambeau, post: 2545882, member: 570071"] LMAO, a right winger? Hardly.... Much more of a McCain moderate. Pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, pro-seperation of church/state... Believe in honor and integrity, neither of which Clinton had. As for Bush, I never cared much for him at all. Thought his tactics were dirty in his first campaign and that he is basically too dumb and underqualified to be prez. I was with him on the tax cuts to revive the economy (which worked) but his deficit spending, cowboy foreign policy and cramming the Christian right social agenda down our mf'in throats basically have me counting the days 'till he is out of office. Politics aside.... First, you don't even know what hearsay means "and are making yourself look like a fool". I keep saying there is evidence v. McGwire, but you choose to ignore that. There is eyewitness testimony (Jose Canseco), physical evidence (his ridiculous growth and unusual performance late in his career) and a defacto admission of guilt (congressional testimony and admitted Andro use). Strong enough for conviction in a court of law? No, but strong enough to sway my opinion when you add it all up. Hypocrisy would be if there were similar evidence against Gwynn and Ripken and I chose to ignore it. [/QUOTE]

Verification