Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="adam71" data-source="post: 2545117" data-attributes="member: 549079">Oh there it is, there it is.&nbsp; That one little phrase right there shows exactly where you stand.&nbsp; You&#039;re a right winger with a right winger mentality.&nbsp; You&#039;re basically a hypocrite.&nbsp; You&#039;re saying there is NO evidence against Gwynn and Ripken and that is basis enough to vote them in.&nbsp; Then you turn around and say there is NO evidence against McGwire but that isn&#039;t enough basis to vote him in becuause he was a POWER hitter.&nbsp; But because you liked Gwynn and Ripken that changes everything.&nbsp; Just like the right wing of the gov&#039;t.&nbsp; &quot;he&#039;s a good ole boy, lets vote him in&quot;.You have NO credible argument why McGwire SHOULDN&#039;T get in.&nbsp; You&#039;re relying on heresay for your whole argument and are making yourself look like a fool.&nbsp; Just stop now.Sounds alot like the current president doesn&#039;t it??</blockquote>

[QUOTE="adam71, post: 2545117, member: 549079"] Oh there it is, there it is. That one little phrase right there shows exactly where you stand. You're a right winger with a right winger mentality. You're basically a hypocrite. You're saying there is NO evidence against Gwynn and Ripken and that is basis enough to vote them in. Then you turn around and say there is NO evidence against McGwire but that isn't enough basis to vote him in becuause he was a POWER hitter. But because you liked Gwynn and Ripken that changes everything. Just like the right wing of the gov't. "he's a good ole boy, lets vote him in". You have NO credible argument why McGwire SHOULDN'T get in. You're relying on heresay for your whole argument and are making yourself look like a fool. Just stop now. Sounds alot like the current president doesn't it?? [/QUOTE]

Verification