Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bigbangtheory" data-source="post: 1988618" data-attributes="member: 563177">Where are you getting 10% at? He is at .227. Plus he has an excellent fielding %. Dont make a lot of errors and will give you 140 plus games behind the plate. Which is pretty good now a days. I wasnt trying to compare him to pudge in his prime. Everyone knows Pudge no matter what team he was on is probably the best catcher now or then. He has had an amazing career even though his stats are down from where they used to be. But still amazing at him catching after all them years. But to say Martinez is one of the worst is really just retarded. He has been an allstar before, so highly doubt they would stick him back there if he was one of the worst catchers in the league just becasue he has a good bat.<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=5007&amp;amp;context=fielding" target="_blank">http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=5007&amp;amp;context=fielding</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="bigbangtheory, post: 1988618, member: 563177"] Where are you getting 10% at? He is at .227. Plus he has an excellent fielding %. Dont make a lot of errors and will give you 140 plus games behind the plate. Which is pretty good now a days. I wasnt trying to compare him to pudge in his prime. Everyone knows Pudge no matter what team he was on is probably the best catcher now or then. He has had an amazing career even though his stats are down from where they used to be. But still amazing at him catching after all them years. But to say Martinez is one of the worst is really just retarded. He has been an allstar before, so highly doubt they would stick him back there if he was one of the worst catchers in the league just becasue he has a good bat. [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=5007&context=fielding"]http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=5007&context=fielding[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification