Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="adam71" data-source="post: 1928715" data-attributes="member: 549079">Talk about NOT getting it.&nbsp; They weren&#039;t originated with replay because the technology was not available for it.&nbsp; Not because they didn&#039;t want it.&nbsp;&nbsp; And of course you would say that when its YOUR team that gets all the calls their way.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifI will sort of agree with you on this...............but only sort of.&nbsp; I agree baseball would be much harder to implement replay on than football, basketball or hockey.&nbsp; Hockey only uses it to see if a puck crossed the goal line or if it crossed before the buzzer or if someone kicked the puck deliberately.&nbsp; Basketball uses it to see if the ball left a players hands before the red light goes off or if a player&#039;s foot was on the 3 point line or not.&nbsp; Football has the MOST aggressive approach to it and that is because football has a pause between every play which makes it easier to implement a replay system.&nbsp; But, they still leave penalties and other judgment calls to the ref and are NOT reviewable.&nbsp;&nbsp; MLB would be the hardest sport to use replay on unless they only used it for certain things such as the following.-to see if a ball hit deep went foul or wrapped around the foul pole for a homerun-an appeal to see if a runner missed a base or left early on a tagup playThats about all I could see using it for.Call me what you want punk but MY boys are still in 1st place without the help of a bunch of blown calls.BTW, the Tigers and Sox meet 13 more times before the season is over.&nbsp; 7 in Detroit and 6 in Chicago.&nbsp; So at the end of all that if they&#039;re still that close in the division then those will all mean something.&nbsp; But if either team hits a slump it won&#039;t matter one bit.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="adam71, post: 1928715, member: 549079"] Talk about NOT getting it. They weren't originated with replay because the technology was not available for it. Not because they didn't want it. And of course you would say that when its YOUR team that gets all the calls their way.[IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] I will sort of agree with you on this...............but only sort of. I agree baseball would be much harder to implement replay on than football, basketball or hockey. Hockey only uses it to see if a puck crossed the goal line or if it crossed before the buzzer or if someone kicked the puck deliberately. Basketball uses it to see if the ball left a players hands before the red light goes off or if a player's foot was on the 3 point line or not. Football has the MOST aggressive approach to it and that is because football has a pause between every play which makes it easier to implement a replay system. But, they still leave penalties and other judgment calls to the ref and are NOT reviewable. MLB would be the hardest sport to use replay on unless they only used it for certain things such as the following. -to see if a ball hit deep went foul or wrapped around the foul pole for a homerun -an appeal to see if a runner missed a base or left early on a tagup play Thats about all I could see using it for. Call me what you want punk but MY boys are still in 1st place without the help of a bunch of blown calls. BTW, the Tigers and Sox meet 13 more times before the season is over. 7 in Detroit and 6 in Chicago. So at the end of all that if they're still that close in the division then those will all mean something. But if either team hits a slump it won't matter one bit. [/QUOTE]

Verification