Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="iceteebone" data-source="post: 1885227" data-attributes="member: 549344">.30 is a lot.  3 percent more of the time granderson is on base then crawford.  all the stats i listed were in granderson's favor.  i'm not saying he is better, i'm saying that you saying crawford is better then granderson will ever be is simply ludacris.  granderson leads crawford in numerous hitting categories so to say crawford is so much better is simply not true.also crawford has not won a gold glove <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/gold_glove_al.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/gold_glove_al.shtml</a>i would love to see crawford on the tigers cause you can put him leadoff and drop granderson to the 3 hole.  also if .30 is nothing on obp, then .17 is even less significant in crawford's ba</blockquote>

Top